Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What Are the Risk Factors for Infection After Operative Treatment of Peritalar Fracture Dislocations?
Levitt, Eli B; Patch, David A; Johnson, Michael D; McLynn, Ryan; Debell, Henry; Harris, James B; Spitler, Clay A.
Affiliation
  • Levitt EB; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; and.
  • Patch DA; Department of Translational Medicine, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL.
  • Johnson MD; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; and.
  • McLynn R; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; and.
  • Debell H; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; and.
  • Harris JB; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; and.
  • Spitler CA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; and.
J Orthop Trauma ; 36(5): 251-256, 2022 05 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34581699
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the risk factors associated with deep infection after operative treatment of peritalar fracture dislocations.

DESIGN:

A retrospective study was performed to identify patients who had operative treatment of a peritalar fracture dislocation over an 11-year period (2008-2019).

SETTING:

Level 1 trauma center.

PARTICIPANTS:

Patients were identified by review of all surgical billing that included open reduction of peritalar dislocation. Minimum follow-up for inclusion was 3 months or the outcome of interest. A total of 178 patients were identified, and 154 patients met inclusion criteria. MAIN

OUTCOME:

The primary outcome was deep infection, defined as return to the operating room for debridement with positive cultures.

RESULTS:

A total of 19 (12.3%) patients developed a postoperative deep infection. The most common associated fractures were talus (47%), calcaneus (33%), and fibula (9%) fractures. The infected group was significantly older (47.2 vs. 39.5 years, P = 0.03). Patients undergoing operative management for peritalar fracture dislocations with current smoking were found to have significantly higher odds of postoperative deep infection (74 vs. 34%, adjusted odds ratio = 7.4, 95% confidence interval, 2.3-24.1, P = 0.001). There was a significantly higher risk of infection in patients with a Gustilo-Anderson type 3 open fracture (32 vs. 12%, adjusted odds ratio = 5.7, 95% confidence interval, 1.6-20.3, P = 0.007). The infected group had high rates of below knee amputation when compared with the group without infection (47 vs. 1%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

In our retrospective study, risk factors for infection after peritalar fracture dislocation included older age, smoking, and Gustilo-Anderson type 3 open fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Talus / Fracture Dislocation / Fractures, Open Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Orthop Trauma Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA / TRAUMATOLOGIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Talus / Fracture Dislocation / Fractures, Open Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Orthop Trauma Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA / TRAUMATOLOGIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article