Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using Statistical Measures and Density Maps Generated From Chest Computed Tomography Scans to Identify and Monitor COVID-19 Cases in Radiation Oncology Rapidly.
Tomé, Marie-Hélène; Gjini, Megi; Zhu, Shaoyu; Kabarriti, Rafi; Guha, Chandan; Garg, Madhur K; Tomé, Wolfgang A; Brodin, N Patrik.
Affiliation
  • Tomé MH; Institute for Onco-Physics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA.
  • Gjini M; Institute for Onco-Physics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA.
  • Zhu S; Institute for Onco-Physics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA.
  • Kabarriti R; Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA.
  • Guha C; Institute for Onco-Physics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA.
  • Garg MK; Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA.
  • Tomé WA; Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA.
  • Brodin NP; Institute for Onco-Physics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA.
Cureus ; 13(8): e17432, 2021 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34589340
ABSTRACT
Objectives This study aimed to evaluate quantitative and qualitative screening measures for anomalous computed tomography (CT) scans in cancer patients with potential coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as an automated detection tool in a radiation oncology treatment setting. Methods We identified a non-COVID-19 cohort and patients with suspected COVID-19 with chest CT scans from February 1, 2020 to June 30, 2020. Lungs were segmented, and a mean normal Hounsfield Unit (HU) histogram was generated for the non-COVID-19 CT scans; these were used to define thresholds for designating the COVID-19-suspected histograms as normal or abnormal. Statistical measures were computed and compared to the threshold levels, and density maps were generated to examine the difference between lungs with and without COVID-19 qualitatively. Results The non-COVID-19 cohort consisted of 70 patients with 70 CT scans, and the cohort of suspected COVID-19 patients consisted of 59 patients with 80 CT scans. Sixty-two patients were positive for COVID-19. The mean HUs and skewness of the intensity histogram discriminated between COVID-19 positive and negative cases, with an area under the curve of 0.948 for positive and 0.944 for negative cases. Skewness correctly identified 57 of 62 positive cases, whereas mean HUs correctly identified 17 of 18 negative cases. Density maps allowed for visualization of the temporal evolution of COVID-19 disease. Conclusions The statistical measures and density maps evaluated here could be employed in an automated screening algorithm for COVID-19 infection. The accuracy is high enough for a simple and rapid screening tool for early identification of suspected infection in patients treated with chemotherapy and radiation therapy already receiving CT scans as part of clinical care. This screening tool could also identify other infections that present critical risks for patients undergoing chemotherapy and radiation therapy, such as pneumonitis.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Language: En Journal: Cureus Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Language: En Journal: Cureus Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States