Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Measuring respiratory symptoms in moderate/severe asthma: evaluation of a respiratory symptom tool, the E-RS®: COPD in asthma populations.
Tabberer, Maggie; von Maltzahn, Robyn; Bacci, Elizabeth D; Karn, Hayley; Hsieh, Ray; Howell, Timothy A; Bailes, Zelie; Fowler, Andrew; Lee, Laurie; Murray, Lindsey T.
Affiliation
  • Tabberer M; GSK House, 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex, TW8 9GS, UK. margaret.x.tabberer@gsk.com.
  • von Maltzahn R; GSK House, 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex, TW8 9GS, UK.
  • Bacci ED; Evidera, Patient-Centered Research, 615 2nd Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
  • Karn H; Evidera, Patient-Centered Research, 201 Talgarth Road, London, W6 8BJ, UK.
  • Hsieh R; Evidera, Patient-Centered Research, 7101 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
  • Howell TA; Evidera, Patient-Centered Research, 7101 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
  • Bailes Z; GSK House, 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex, TW8 9GS, UK.
  • Fowler A; GSK House, 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex, TW8 9GS, UK.
  • Lee L; GSK, 1250 S Collegeville Road, Collegeville, PA, 19426, USA.
  • Murray LT; Evidera, Patient-Centered Research, 7101 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
J Patient Rep Outcomes ; 5(1): 104, 2021 Oct 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34632556
BACKGROUND: Symptom constructs included in the Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (E-RS®: COPD) tool may be relevant to patients with asthma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate content validity and psychometric performance of the E-RS: COPD in moderate/severe asthma patients. METHODS: Content validity of the E-RS: COPD was evaluated in patients with moderate/severe asthma using concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews. Secondary analyses using data from two clinical trials in patients with moderate/severe asthma evaluated the factor structure of the E-RS: COPD plus two supplementary items (wheeze; shortness of breath with strenuous physical activity) and assessed psychometric properties of the tool, which will be referred to as E-RS®: Asthma when used in asthma populations. RESULTS: Qualitative interviews (N = 25) achieved concept saturation for asthma respiratory symptoms. Concepts in the E-RS: COPD were relevant to patients and instructions were understood. Most patients (19/25; 76%) reported experiencing all concepts in the E-RS: COPD; no patients indicated missing symptoms. Secondary analyses of clinical trial data supported the original factor structure (RS-Total and three symptom-specific subscales). The two supplemental items did not fit with this factor structure and were not retained. RS-Total and subscale score reliability was high (internal consistency [α] > 0.70). Validity was demonstrated through significant (P < 0.0001) relationships with the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and Asthma Symptom Severity scale. E-RS: Asthma was responsive to change when evaluated using SGRQ, Patient Global Impression of Change and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire as anchors (P < 0.0001). Clinically meaningful change thresholds were also identified (RS-Total: - 2.0 units). CONCLUSIONS: The E-RS: Asthma is reliable and responsive for evaluating respiratory symptoms in patients with moderate/severe asthma.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspects: Patient_preference Language: En Journal: J Patient Rep Outcomes Year: 2021 Document type: Article Country of publication: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspects: Patient_preference Language: En Journal: J Patient Rep Outcomes Year: 2021 Document type: Article Country of publication: Germany