Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does MOSES pulse modulation reduce short-term catheter reinsertion following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate?
Klett, Dane E; Baird, Bryce; Ball, Colleen T; Dora, Chandler D.
Affiliation
  • Klett DE; Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Baird B; Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Ball CT; Department of Biomedical Statistics & Informatics, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Dora CD; Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA. dora.chandler@mayo.edu.
Investig Clin Urol ; 62(6): 666-671, 2021 11.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34729966
PURPOSE: Previously published studies have shown small prostate size, capsular perforation and intraoperative bladder distension are associated with failed trial without a catheter (TWOC) after HoLEP. The study objective was to determine the relationship between MOSES pulse modulation versus standard laser technology and short-term catheter reinsertion following failed TWOC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 487 patients who underwent HoLEP, using standard holmium laser settings (180 patients) or MOSES pulse modulation (255 patients), between August 2018 and February 2021. Catheter reinsertion defined as reinsertion following failed TWOC within 30 days of surgery. Association of pulse modulation with catheter reinsertion was examined using single and multivariable logistic regression models. Comparisons of pre and intraoperative characteristics between patients treated without and with pulse modulation were made using a Wilcoxon rank sum test for numeric characteristics or Fisher's exact test for categorical characteristics. RESULTS: Short-term catheter reinsertion occurred in 14% (26/180) of the standard laser setting group as compared with 10% (24/252) of the pulse modulation group. There was no statistically significant association with short-term catheter reinsertion in single (unadjusted OR [standard settings vs. pulse modulation], 1.60; 95% CI, 0.80-2.91; p=0.12) or multivariable analysis adjusting for specimen weight and operative time (adjusted OR [standard settings vs. pulse modulation], 1.44; 95% CI, 0.77-2.68; p=0.25). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found no association between post-HoLEP short-term catheter reinsertion following failed TWOC and MOSES pulse modulation. Although MOSES pulse modulation offers several well-documented advantages, catheter reinsertion events appear to be attributable to other factors.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Postoperative Complications / Prostatectomy / Prostatic Hyperplasia / Urinary Catheterization / Retreatment / Laser Therapy Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Investig Clin Urol Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: Korea (South)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Postoperative Complications / Prostatectomy / Prostatic Hyperplasia / Urinary Catheterization / Retreatment / Laser Therapy Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Investig Clin Urol Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: Korea (South)