Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Noncontrast Computed Tomography vs Computed Tomography Perfusion or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Selection in Late Presentation of Stroke With Large-Vessel Occlusion.
Nguyen, Thanh N; Abdalkader, Mohamad; Nagel, Simon; Qureshi, Muhammad M; Ribo, Marc; Caparros, Francois; Haussen, Diogo C; Mohammaden, Mahmoud H; Sheth, Sunil A; Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago; Siegler, James E; Zaidi, Syed; Olive-Gadea, Marta; Henon, Hilde; Möhlenbruch, Markus A; Castonguay, Alicia C; Nannoni, Stefania; Kaesmacher, Johannes; Puri, Ajit S; Seker, Fatih; Farooqui, Mudassir; Salazar-Marioni, Sergio; Kuhn, Anna L; Kaliaev, Artem; Farzin, Behzad; Boisseau, William; Masoud, Hesham E; Lopez, Carlos Ynigo; Rana, Ameena; Kareem, Samer Abdul; Sathya, Anvitha; Klein, Piers; Kassem, Mohammad W; Ringleb, Peter A; Cordonnier, Charlotte; Gralla, Jan; Fischer, Urs; Michel, Patrik; Jovin, Tudor G; Raymond, Jean; Zaidat, Osama O; Nogueira, Raul G.
Affiliation
  • Nguyen TN; Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Abdalkader M; Department of Radiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Nagel S; Department of Radiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Qureshi MM; Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Ribo M; Department of Radiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Caparros F; Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Haussen DC; Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Mohammaden MH; University Lille, Inserm, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, U1172, LilNCog-Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, Lille, France.
  • Sheth SA; Department of Neurology, Grady Memorial Hospital, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Ortega-Gutierrez S; Department of Neurology, Grady Memorial Hospital, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Siegler JE; Department of Neurology, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, Texas.
  • Zaidi S; Department of Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
  • Olive-Gadea M; Department of Neurology, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey.
  • Henon H; Department of Neurology, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio.
  • Möhlenbruch MA; Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Castonguay AC; University Lille, Inserm, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, U1172, LilNCog-Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, Lille, France.
  • Nannoni S; Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Kaesmacher J; Department of Neurology, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio.
  • Puri AS; Stroke Center, Neurology Service, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Seker F; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Farooqui M; Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Salazar-Marioni S; Neurointerventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, Massachusetts.
  • Kuhn AL; Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Kaliaev A; Department of Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
  • Farzin B; Department of Neurology, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, Texas.
  • Boisseau W; Neurointerventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, Massachusetts.
  • Masoud HE; Department of Radiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Lopez CY; Interventional Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Rana A; Interventional Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Kareem SA; Department of Neurology, SUNY Upstate Medical University Hospital, Syracuse, New York.
  • Sathya A; Department of Neurology, SUNY Upstate Medical University Hospital, Syracuse, New York.
  • Klein P; Department of Neurology, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey.
  • Kassem MW; Neuroscience and Stroke Program, Bon Secours Mercy Health St Vincent Hospital, Toledo, Ohio.
  • Ringleb PA; Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Cordonnier C; Department of Radiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Gralla J; Neuroscience and Stroke Program, Bon Secours Mercy Health St Vincent Hospital, Toledo, Ohio.
  • Fischer U; Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Michel P; University Lille, Inserm, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, U1172, LilNCog-Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, Lille, France.
  • Jovin TG; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Raymond J; Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Zaidat OO; Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland.
  • Nogueira RG; Stroke Center, Neurology Service, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
JAMA Neurol ; 79(1): 22-31, 2022 01 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34747975
ABSTRACT
Importance Advanced imaging for patient selection in mechanical thrombectomy is not widely available.

Objective:

To compare the clinical outcomes of patients selected for mechanical thrombectomy by noncontrast computed tomography (CT) vs those selected by computed tomography perfusion (CTP) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the extended time window. Design, Setting, and

Participants:

This multinational cohort study included consecutive patients with proximal anterior circulation occlusion stroke presenting within 6 to 24 hours of time last seen well from January 2014 to December 2020. This study was conducted at 15 sites across 5 countries in Europe and North America. The duration of follow-up was 90 days from stroke onset. Exposures Computed tomography with Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, CTP, or MRI. Main Outcomes and

Measures:

The primary end point was the distribution of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 90 days (ordinal shift). Secondary outcomes included the rates of 90-day functional independence (mRS scores of 0-2), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and 90-day mortality.

Results:

Of 2304 patients screened for eligibility, 1604 patients were included, with a median (IQR) age of 70 (59-80) years; 848 (52.9%) were women. A total of 534 patients were selected to undergo mechanical thrombectomy by CT, 752 by CTP, and 318 by MRI. After adjustment of confounders, there was no difference in 90-day ordinal mRS shift between patients selected by CT vs CTP (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.77-1.17]; P = .64) or CT vs MRI (aOR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.8-1.13]; P = .55). The rates of 90-day functional independence (mRS scores 0-2 vs 3-6) were similar between patients selected by CT vs CTP (aOR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.7-1.16]; P = .42) but lower in patients selected by MRI than CT (aOR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.64-0.98]; P = .03). Successful reperfusion was more common in the CT and CTP groups compared with the MRI group (474 [88.9%] and 670 [89.5%] vs 250 [78.9%]; P < .001). No significant differences in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (CT, 42 [8.1%]; CTP, 43 [5.8%]; MRI, 15 [4.7%]; P = .11) or 90-day mortality (CT, 125 [23.4%]; CTP, 159 [21.1%]; MRI, 62 [19.5%]; P = .38) were observed. Conclusions and Relevance In patients undergoing proximal anterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy in the extended time window, there were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes of patients selected with noncontrast CT compared with those selected with CTP or MRI. These findings have the potential to widen the indication for treating patients in the extended window using a simpler and more widespread noncontrast CT-only paradigm.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Arterial Occlusive Diseases / Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Stroke / Perfusion Imaging Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: JAMA Neurol Year: 2022 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Arterial Occlusive Diseases / Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Stroke / Perfusion Imaging Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: JAMA Neurol Year: 2022 Document type: Article
...