Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cross-modal perceptual enhancement of unisensory targets is uni-directional and does not affect temporal expectations.
Ball, Felix; Nentwich, Annika; Noesselt, Toemme.
Affiliation
  • Ball F; Department of Biological Psychology, Faculty of Natural Science, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Germany; Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Germany. Electronic address: Felix.Ball@ovgu.de.
  • Nentwich A; Department of Biological Psychology, Faculty of Natural Science, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Germany.
  • Noesselt T; Department of Biological Psychology, Faculty of Natural Science, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Germany; Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Germany.
Vision Res ; 190: 107962, 2022 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34757275
ABSTRACT
Temporal structures in the environment can shape temporal expectations (TE); and previous studies demonstrated that TEs interact with multisensory interplay (MSI) when multisensory stimuli are presented synchronously. Here, we tested whether other types of MSI - evoked by asynchronous yet temporally flanking irrelevant stimuli - result in similar performance patterns. To this end, we presented sequences of 12 stimuli (10 Hz) which consisted of auditory (A), visual (V) or alternating auditory-visual stimuli (e.g. A-V-A-V-…) with either auditory or visual targets (Exp. 1). Participants discriminated target frequencies (auditory pitch or visual spatial frequency) embedded in these sequences. To test effects of TE, the proportion of early and late temporal target positions was manipulated run-wise. Performance for unisensory targets was affected by temporally flanking distractors, with auditory temporal flankers selectively improving visual target perception (Exp. 1). However, no effect of temporal expectation was observed. Control experiments (Exp. 2-3) tested whether this lack of TE effect was due to the higher presentation frequency in Exp. 1 relative to previous experiments. Importantly, even at higher stimulation frequencies redundant multisensory targets (Exp. 2-3) reliably modulated TEs. Together, our results indicate that visual target detection was enhanced by MSI. However, this cross-modal enhancement - in contrast to the redundant target effect - was still insufficient to generate TEs. We posit that unisensory target representations were either instable or insufficient for the generation of TEs while less demanding MSI still occurred; highlighting the need for robust stimulus representations when generating temporal expectations.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Auditory Perception / Motivation Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Vision Res Year: 2022 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Auditory Perception / Motivation Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Vision Res Year: 2022 Document type: Article