Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Five-year survival after elective open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.
Lieberg, Jüri; Kadatski, Karl G; Kals, Mart; Paapstel, Kaido; Kals, Jaak.
Affiliation
  • Lieberg J; Department of Vascular Surgery, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
  • Kadatski KG; Medical Faculty, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
  • Kals M; Estonian Genome Centre, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Paapstel K; Department of Cardiology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
  • Kals J; Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, 8 Puusepa Street, Tartu 51014, Estonia Department of Vascular Surgery, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
Scand J Surg ; 111(1): 14574969211048707, 2022.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34779283
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE:

Current evidence suggests short-term survival benefit from endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) versus open surgical repair (OSR) in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) procedures, but this benefit is lost during long-term follow-up. The aim of this study was to compare short- and mid-term all-cause mortality in patients with non-ruptured aneurysm treated by OSR and EVAR; and to assess the rate of complications and reinterventions, as well as to evaluate their impact on survival.

METHODS:

The medical records of the non-ruptured AAA patients undergoing OSR or EVAR between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2019 at Tartu University Hospital, Estonia, were retrospectively reviewed. We gathered survival data from the national registry (mean follow-up period was 3.7 ± 2.3 years).

RESULTS:

A total of 225 non-ruptured AAA patients were treated operatively out of whom 95 (42.2%) were EVAR and 130 (57.8%) were OSR procedures. The difference in estimated all-cause mortality between the OSR and EVAR groups at day 30 was statistically irrelevant (2.3% vs 0%; p = 0.140), but OSR patients showed statistically significantly higher 5 year survival compared with EVAR patients (75.3% vs 50.0%, p = 0.002). Complication and reintervention rates for the EVAR and OSR groups did not differ statistically (26.3% vs 16.9%, p = 0.122; 10.5% vs 11.5%, p = 0.981, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that greater aneurysm diameter (p = 0.012), EVAR procedure (p = 0.016), male gender (p = 0.023), and cerebrovascular diseases (p = 0.028) were independently positively associated with 5-year mortality.

CONCLUSIONS:

Thirty-day mortality, and complication and reintervention rates for EVAR and OSR after elective AAA repair were similar. Although the EVAR procedure is an independent risk factor for 5-year mortality, higher age and greater proportion of comorbidities among EVAR patients may influence not only the choice of treatment modality, but also prognosis.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / Endovascular Procedures Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Scand J Surg Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estonia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / Endovascular Procedures Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Scand J Surg Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estonia