Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Linear dimensional accuracy of stereolithographic surgical guide after chemistry and physics sterilization.
Matheus, Diego Moraes De; Gomes, Erica Alves; Barcellos, Daphne Camara; Rosetti, Elizabeth Pimentel; Margonar, Rogério.
Affiliation
  • Matheus DM; Private Practitioner, DDS, MS. University Centre of Araraquara, UNIARA, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.
  • Gomes EA; DDS, MS, PhD, Doctor Assistant Professor, School of Dentistry, University of Ribeirão Preto, UNAERP, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
  • Barcellos DC; DDS, MS, PhD, Adjunct Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES, Brazil. Electronic address: daphnecbarcellos@hotmail.com.
  • Rosetti EP; DDS, MS, PhD, Adjunct Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES, Brazil.
  • Margonar R; DDS, MS, PhD, Doctor Assistant Professor, School of Dentistry, University of Ribeirão Preto, UNAERP, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 123(5): 510-513, 2022 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34844017
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dimensional stability of prototyped surgical guides after autoclave and 2% glutaraldehyde sterilization processes. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Twenty prototyped surgical guides were prepared and submitted to two sterilization processes (n = 10) Physics - sterilization by autoclave (saturated water vapor under pressure, temperature of 126 to 130 °C, pressure of 1,7 at 1.9 kgf/cm2, 16 min); Chemistry - sterilization by 2% glutaraldehyde for 10 h. Six pre-established points were measured in the prototyped surgical guides, before and after sterilization, using a digital caliper rule. The comparisons were made using orthogonal contrasts using the linear model of mixed effects (random and fixed).

RESULTS:

there are no significant differences between autoclave and glutaraldehyde 2% (p>0.05) there are significant differences after autoclave sterilization (p<0.05) and there are not significant differences after 2% glutaraldehyde sterilization (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION:

autoclave promoted dimensional alteration of the prototyped surgical guides, and the chemical sterilization by glutaraldehyde 2% did not cause dimensional alteration of the prototype surgical guides, being a favorable choice for sterilization. CLINICAL

SIGNIFICANCE:

the sterilization of surgical guides can be performed through the chemical process with 2% glutaraldehyde without changing the linear precision of the prototype surgical guides.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Steam / Sterilization Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Steam / Sterilization Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil