Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Anthropometric method for estimating component sizes in total hip arthroplasty.
Sahemey, Rajpreet; Moores, Thomas S; Meacher, Hannah; Youssef, Bishoy; Khan, Shehzaad; Evans, Christopher R.
Affiliation
  • Sahemey R; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry CV2 2DX, United Kingdom. rajpreet.s@gmail.com.
  • Moores TS; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Walsall Manor Hospital, Walsall WS2 9PS, United Kingdom.
  • Meacher H; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 6QG, United Kingdom.
  • Youssef B; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 6QG, United Kingdom.
  • Khan S; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore HA7 4LP, United Kingdom.
  • Evans CR; Department of Orthopaedics, The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Oswestry SY10 7AG, United Kingdom.
World J Orthop ; 12(11): 859-866, 2021 Nov 18.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34888146
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Preoperative templating is essential in total hip arthroplasty (THA) as it not only helps to facilitate the correct implant type and size but also determines the post-operative biomechanics. Templating is also increasingly important from a medico-legal perspective and recommended in the British Orthopaedic Association Guide to Good Practice. Although templating has become increasingly digitised, there are no simple anthropometric models to predict implant sizes in the absence of digital methods.

AIM:

To assess the accuracy of using an easily obtainable measurement (shoe size) to predict component sizes in THA compared with digital templating.

METHODS:

Digital radiographs from a cohort of 102 patients (40 male, 62 female) who had undergone uncemented or hybrid THA at a single centre were retrospectively templated to desired cup and stem sizes using TraumaCad ® . We compared the templated size to the actual size of the implant and assessed if there was any correlation with the patient's shoe size.

RESULTS:

Statistically significant positive correlations were observed between shoe size and templated cup size (ρ = 0.92, P < 0.001); shoe size with implanted cup size (ρ = 0.71, P < 0.001); shoe size and templated stem size (ρ = 0.87, P < 0.001); and shoe size with implanted stem size (ρ = 0.57, P < 0.001). Templated and implanted acetabular cup sizes were positively correlated (ρ = 0.76, P < 0.001) and were exact in 43.1% cases; 80.4% of implanted cup sizes were within 1 size (+/- 2 mm) of the template and 100% within 2 sizes (+/- 4 mm). Positive correlation was also demonstrated between templated and implanted femoral stem sizes (ρ = 0.69, P < 0.001) and were exact in 52.6% cases; 92.6% were within 1 size of the template and 98% within 2 sizes.

CONCLUSION:

This study has shown there to be a significant positive correlation between shoe size and templated size. Anthropometric measurements are easily obtainable and can be used to predict uncemented component sizes in the absence of digital methods.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: World J Orthop Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: World J Orthop Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom