Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
2BALANCE: Test-retest reliability of a cognitive-motor dual-task protocol.
Danneels, Maya; Van Hecke, Ruth; Leyssens, Laura; Cambier, Dirk; van de Berg, Raymond; Van de Velde, Laura; Van Rompaey, Vincent; Maes, Leen.
Affiliation
  • Danneels M; Ghent University, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Van Hecke R; Ghent University, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Leyssens L; Ghent University, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Cambier D; Ghent University, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent, Belgium.
  • van de Berg R; Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht, Netherlands.
  • Van de Velde L; Faculty of Physics, Tomsk State Research University, Tomsk, Russia.
  • Van Rompaey V; Ghent University, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Maes L; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
J Vestib Res ; 32(4): 341-353, 2022.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34974447
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Aside from typical symptoms such as dizziness and vertigo, persons with vestibular disorders often have cognitive and motor problems. These symptoms have been assessed in single-task condition. However, dual-tasks assessing cognitive-motor interference might be an added value as they reflect daily life situations better. Therefore, the 2BALANCE protocol was developed. In the current study, the test-retest reliability of this protocol was assessed.

METHODS:

The 2BALANCE protocol was performed twice in 20 healthy young adults with an in-between test interval of two weeks. Two motor tasks and five different cognitive tasks were performed in single and dual-task condition. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), the standard error of measurement, and the minimal detectable difference were calculated.

RESULTS:

All cognitive tasks, with the exception of the mental rotation task, had favorable reliability results (0.26≤ICC≤0.91). The dynamic motor task indicated overall substantial reliability values in all conditions (0.67≤ICC≤0.98). Similar results were found for the static motor task during dual-tasking (0.50≤ICC≤0.92), but were slightly lower in single-task condition (-0.26≤ICC≤0.75).

CONCLUSIONS:

The 2BALANCE protocol was overall consistent across trials. However, the mental rotation task showed lowest reliability values.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cognition / Gait Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: J Vestib Res Journal subject: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Belgium

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cognition / Gait Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: J Vestib Res Journal subject: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Belgium