Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of operators experience on peri-procedural outcomes with Watchman FLX: Insights from the FLX-SPA registry.
Cruz-González, Ignacio; Torres Saura, Francisco; Trejo-Velasco, Blanca; Antonio Fernández Díaz, José; Fajardo Molina, Ricardo; Del Valle-Fernández, Raquel; Moreno Terribas, Gerardo; Martí Sánchez, David; López-Mínguez, José-Ramón; Gomez-Blazquez, Ivan; Sanmartin Pena, Juan-Carlos; Botas, Javier; Martin Lorenzo, Pedro; Palazuelos, Jorge; Albarrán Rincon, Ramón; Mohandes, Mohsen; Rodriguez Entem, Felipe-Jose; Martí, Gerard; Valero, Ernesto; Gutiérrez, Hipólito; Amat-Santos, Ignacio J; Nombela-Franco, Luis; Salinas, Pablo; Teruel, Luis; Gomez-Hospital, Joan-Antoni; Arzamendi, Dabit; Torres Sanabria, Mario; Calle Pérez, Germán; Cañadas Pruaño, Dolores; Pérez de Prado, Armando; Benito González, Tomás; Arroyo-Úcar, Eduardo; Estévez-Loureiro, Rodrigo; Caneiro-Queija, Berenice; Ibañez Criado, Jose L; Ruiz-Nodar, Juan M.
Affiliation
  • Cruz-González I; Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Salamanca, Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, Spain.
  • Torres Saura F; Biomedical Research Networking Center on Cardiovascular Diseases (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain.
  • Trejo-Velasco B; Interventional Cardiology Unit, University Hospital del Vinalopó, Elche, Spain.
  • Antonio Fernández Díaz J; Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Salamanca, Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, Spain.
  • Fajardo Molina R; Interventional Cardiology Unit, University Hospital Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain.
  • Del Valle-Fernández R; Cardiology Department, University Hospital Torrecárdenas, Almería, Spain.
  • Moreno Terribas G; Cardiology Department, University Hospital Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
  • Martí Sánchez D; Interventional Cardiology Unit, Cardiology Department, University Hospital Clinico San Cecilio Granada, Spain.
  • López-Mínguez JR; Medical School, University of Granada, Spain.
  • Gomez-Blazquez I; Cardiology Department, Hospital Central de la Defensa, Madrid, Spain.
  • Sanmartin Pena JC; Medical School, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
  • Botas J; Cardiology Department, Infanta Cristina University Hospital of Badajoz, Spain.
  • Martin Lorenzo P; Medical School, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain.
  • Palazuelos J; Cardiology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
  • Albarrán Rincon R; Cardiology Department, Clinic University Hospital of Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
  • Mohandes M; Cardiology Department, University Hospital Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
  • Rodriguez Entem FJ; Rey Juan Carlos University School of Medicine, Madrid, Spain.
  • Martí G; Interventional Cardiology Unit, Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Gran Canaria Dr. Negrin, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
  • Valero E; Cardiology Department, Hospital La Luz, Madrid, Spain.
  • Gutiérrez H; Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery Department, University Clinic of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
  • Amat-Santos IJ; Interventional Cardiology Unit, Joan XXIII University Hospital, Tarragona, Spain.
  • Nombela-Franco L; Cardiology Department, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
  • Salinas P; Cardiology Department, University Hospital Vall d́Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Teruel L; Cardiology Department, Clinic University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
  • Gomez-Hospital JA; Biomedical Research Networking Center on Cardiovascular Diseases (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain.
  • Arzamendi D; Cardiology Department, Clinic University Hospital of Valladolid, Spain.
  • Torres Sanabria M; Biomedical Research Networking Center on Cardiovascular Diseases (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain.
  • Calle Pérez G; Cardiology Department, Clinic University Hospital of Valladolid, Spain.
  • Cañadas Pruaño D; Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
  • Pérez de Prado A; Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
  • Benito González T; Cardiology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital-IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Arroyo-Úcar E; Cardiology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital-IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Estévez-Loureiro R; Cardiology Department, University Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Caneiro-Queija B; Cardiology Department, University Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Ibañez Criado JL; Cardiology Department, University Hospital Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain.
  • Ruiz-Nodar JM; Cardiology Department, University Hospital Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain.
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc ; 38: 100941, 2022 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35024431
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The Watchman FLX is a device upgrade of the Watchman 2.5 that incorporates several design enhancements intended to simplify left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) and improve procedural outcomes. This study compares peri-procedural results of LAAO with Watchman FLX (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts) in centers with varying degrees of experience with the Watchman 2.5 and Watchman FLX.

METHODS:

Prospective, multicenter, "real-world" registry including consecutive patients undergoing LAAO with the Watchman FLX at 26 Spanish sites (FLX-SPA registry). Implanting centers were classified according to the center's prior experience with the Watchman 2.5. A further division of centers according to whether or not they had performed ≤ 10 or > 10Watchman FLX implants was prespecified at the beginning of the study. Procedural outcomes of institutions stratified according to their experience with the Watchman 2.5 and FLX devices were compared.

RESULTS:

359 patients [mean age 75.5 (SD8.1), CHA2DS2-VASc 4.4 (SD1.4), HAS-BLED 3.8(SD0.9)] were included. Global success rate was 98.6%, successful LAAO with the first selected device size was achieved in 95.5% patients and the device was implanted at first attempt in 78.6% cases. There were only 9(2.5%) major peri-procedural complications. No differences in efficacy or safety results according to the centers previous experience with Watchman 2.5 and procedural volume with Watchman FLX existed.

CONCLUSIONS:

The Watchman FLX attains high procedural success rates with complete LAA sealing in unselected, real-world patients, along with a low incidence of peri-procedural complications, regardless of operators experience with its previous device iteration or the number of Watchman FLX devices implanted.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials Language: En Journal: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Spain

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials Language: En Journal: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Spain