Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Confounds of using the unc-58 selection marker highlights the importance of genotyping co-CRISPR genes.
Rawsthorne-Manning, Helena; Calahorro, Fernando; G Izquierdo, Patricia; Tardy, Philippe; Boulin, Thomas; Holden-Dye, Lindy; O'Connor, Vincent; Dillon, James.
Affiliation
  • Rawsthorne-Manning H; School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
  • Calahorro F; School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
  • G Izquierdo P; School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
  • Tardy P; Institut NeuroMyoGène, Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS UMR 5310, INSERM U1217, Lyon, France.
  • Boulin T; Institut NeuroMyoGène, Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS UMR 5310, INSERM U1217, Lyon, France.
  • Holden-Dye L; School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
  • O'Connor V; School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
  • Dillon J; School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
PLoS One ; 17(1): e0253351, 2022.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35041685
Multiple advances have been made to increase the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 editing using the model genetic organism Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans). Here we report on the use of co-CRISPR 'marker' genes: worms in which co-CRISPR events have occurred have overt, visible phenotypes which facilitates the selection of worms that harbour CRISPR events in the target gene. Mutation in the co-CRISPR gene is then removed by outcrossing to wild type but this can be challenging if the CRISPR and co-CRISPR gene are hard to segregate. However, segregating away the co-CRISPR modified gene can be less challenging if the worms selected appear wild type and are selected from a jackpot brood. These are broods in which a high proportion of the progeny of a single injected worm display the co-CRISPR phenotype suggesting high CRISPR efficiency. This can deliver worms that harbour the desired mutation in the target gene locus without the co-CRISPR mutation. We have successfully generated a discrete mutation in the C. elegans nlg-1 gene using this method. However, in the process of sequencing to authenticate editing in the nlg-1 gene we discovered genomic rearrangements that arise at the co-CRISPR gene unc-58 that by visual observation were phenotypically silent but nonetheless resulted in a significant reduction in motility scored by thrashing behaviour. This highlights that careful consideration of the hidden consequences of co-CRISPR mediated genetic changes should be taken before downstream analysis of gene function. Given this, we suggest sequencing of co-CRISPR genes following CRISPR procedures that utilise phenotypic selection as part of the pipeline.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Genotype Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Genotype Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom Country of publication: United States