Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Repeatability, robustness, and reproducibility of texture features on 3 Tesla liver MRI.
Prabhu, Vinay; Gillingham, Nicolas; Babb, James S; Mali, Rahul D; Rusinek, Henry; Bruno, Mary T; Chandarana, Hersh.
Affiliation
  • Prabhu V; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States of America. Electronic address: vinay.prabhu@nyulangone.org.
  • Gillingham N; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States of America. Electronic address: Nicolas.gillingham@mountsinai.org.
  • Babb JS; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States of America; Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America. Electronic address: james.babb@nyulangone.org.
  • Mali RD; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States of America; Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America. Electronic address: Rahul.mali@nyulangone.org.
  • Rusinek H; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States of America; Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America. Electronic address: hr18@nyu.edu.
  • Bruno MT; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States of America. Electronic address: mary.bruno@nyulangone.org.
  • Chandarana H; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States of America; Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America. Electronic address: hersh.chandarana@nyulangone.org.
Clin Imaging ; 83: 177-183, 2022 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35092926
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Texture features are proposed for classification and prognostication, with lacking information about variability. We assessed 3 T liver MRI feature variability.

METHODS:

Five volunteers underwent standard 3 T MRI, and repeated with identical and altered parameters. Two readers placed regions of interest using 3DSlicer. Repeatability (between standard and repeat scan), robustness (between standard and parameter changed scan), and reproducibility (two reader variation) were computed using coefficient of variation (CV).

RESULTS:

67%, 49%, and 61% of features had good-to-excellent (CV ≤ 10%) repeatability on ADC, T1, and T2, respectively, least frequently for first order (19-35%). 22%, 19%, and 21% of features had good-to-excellent robustness on ADC, T1, and T2, respectively. 52%, 35%, and 25% of feature measurements had good-to-excellent inter-reader reproducibility on ADC, T1, and T2, respectively, with highest good-to-excellent reproducibility for first order features on ADC/T1.

CONCLUSION:

We demonstrated large variations in texture features on 3 T liver MRI. Further study should evaluate methods to reduce variability.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Liver Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Imaging Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Year: 2022 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Liver Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Imaging Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Year: 2022 Document type: Article