Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Caffeinated Gum Does Not Influence RPE-Regulated Cadence in Recreationally-Active College Females Regardless of Habitual Caffeine Consumption.
Mask, Maria L; Alghamdi, Bandar A; Killen, Lauren G; Green, James M; O'Neal, Eric K; Waldman, Hunter S.
Affiliation
  • Mask ML; Department of Kinesiology, University of North Alabama, Florence, AL, USA.
  • Alghamdi BA; Department of Kinesiology, University of North Alabama, Florence, AL, USA.
  • Killen LG; Department of Kinesiology, University of North Alabama, Florence, AL, USA.
  • Green JM; Department of Kinesiology, University of North Alabama, Florence, AL, USA.
  • O'Neal EK; Department of Kinesiology, University of North Alabama, Florence, AL, USA.
  • Waldman HS; Department of Kinesiology, University of North Alabama, Florence, AL, USA.
Int J Exerc Sci ; 14(2): 1375-1387, 2021.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35096234
ABSTRACT
Caffeine (CAF) has been extensively studied for its ergogenic and analgesic effects during exercise. However, the majority of these studies have been conducted in male populations. This study investigated the effects of acute CAF chewing gum on self-selected exercise intensity during a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) production trial in active females (n = 16, 21.0 ± 2.8 y). Data were also analyzed based on habitual CAF consumption level. Participants completed a V̇O2peak trial, followed by a familiarization and two randomized, triple-blinded experimental RPE production trials on an arm ergometer [clamped resistance, blinded to self-selected cadence (CAD)] with either CAF gum (300 mg; 4.8 ± 0.7 mg/kg-1 body mass) or placebo (PLA), at a prescribed RPE of 4 and 7 (10 min each). Self-selected CAD did not statistically differ (p > 0.05) between CAF or PLA for an RPE4 (37.7 ± 1.6 vs. 37.6 ± 1.6 rev·min-1) or RPE7 (42.9 ± 1.6 vs. 41.2 ± 1.7 rev·min-1), respectively. There were no statistical differences between treatment groups for any other variables, except restlessness rating which was significantly higher (3.5 vs. 2.2; p = 0.03, d = 0.64) for the CAF group compared to PLA. Secondary analysis revealed no statistical differences for any variables between habitual consumers of low (23 ± 20 mg/day) or mod/high (195 ± 93 mg/day) CAF. Our data support previous studies examining CAF in women across different testing modalities and suggest that regardless of habitual CAF consumption, females might require higher doses of CAF to replicate subjective and physiological responses commonly observed using similar RPE production protocols in male participants. These findings support the need for additional investigations into female physiological and perceptual responses following CAF ingestion.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline Language: En Journal: Int J Exerc Sci Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline Language: En Journal: Int J Exerc Sci Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States