Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Withaferin A suppresses skin tumor promotion by inhibiting proteasome-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 degradation.
Xu, Kaiyue; Zhang, Chunjing; Li, Youbo; Xi, Xin; Zheng, Lishuang; Meng, Ming; Liu, Tongtong; Zhao, Yunfeng; Li, Wenjuan.
Affiliation
  • Xu K; College of Medicine, Hebei University, Baoding 071000, China.
  • Zhang C; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161006, China.
  • Li Y; College of Medicine, Hebei University, Baoding 071000, China.
  • Xi X; Hebei Key Laboratory of Cancer Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy, Baoding 071000, China.
  • Zheng L; Hebei Key Laboratory of Cancer Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy, Baoding 071000, China.
  • Meng M; College of Medicine, Hebei University, Baoding 071000, China.
  • Liu T; Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding 071000, China.
  • Zhao Y; Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology & Neuroscience, LSU Health Sciences Center in Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA.
  • Li W; College of Medicine, Hebei University, Baoding 071000, China.
Transl Cancer Res ; 8(6): 2449-2460, 2019 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35116997
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The metabolic enzyme isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) belonging to ß-decarboxylase dehydrogenase family has been identified as a tumor suppressor. Withaferin A (WA), a bioactive compound derived from Withania somnifera, has the anti-tumor activity. Based on the data set that WA inhibited 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA)-induced IDH1 inactivation and mitochondrial dysfunction, we focused on how WA suppressed the skin carcinogenesis mediated by IDH1.

METHODS:

The mRNA levels of IDH1 were measured after treated with TPA and/or WA. The expression of IDH1, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) involved in glycolysis, hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) and its target gene glucose transporter-1 (Glut1) were detected. The activities of proteasome and the mitochondrial complex I related to mitochondrial functions were determined. The enzymatic activities of LDH, proline hydroxylase (PHD) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were analyzed.

RESULTS:

The qPCR data have shown the mRNA levels of IDH1 were no difference with TPA and/or WA treatment. Next, data demonstrated that WA could stabilize IDH1 by inhibiting the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (UPP). Followed by illuminating the mechanism of IDH1 inhibiting tumorigenesis, the results mirrored that upregulated IDH1 suppressed LDH activity whereas increased mitochondrial complex I activity. Furthermore, via its product α-KG, upregulated IDH1 activated PHD, and inhibited HIF-1α and its downstream signaling pathway.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results indicate that WA inhibits tumor promotion partially via stabilizing IDH1, leading to inactivating the HIF-1α signaling.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Transl Cancer Res Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Transl Cancer Res Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China