Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Low-dose CT of the abdomen: Initial experience on a novel photon-counting detector CT and comparison with energy-integrating detector CT.
Decker, Josua A; Bette, Stefanie; Lubina, Nora; Rippel, Katharina; Braun, Franziska; Risch, Franka; Woznicki, Piotr; Wollny, Claudia; Scheurig-Muenkler, Christian; Kroencke, Thomas J; Schwarz, Florian.
Affiliation
  • Decker JA; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany. Electronic address: josua.decker@uk-augsburg.de.
  • Bette S; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany. Electronic address: stefanie.bette@uk-augsburg.de.
  • Lubina N; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany. Electronic address: nora.lubina@uk-augsburg.de.
  • Rippel K; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany. Electronic address: katharina.rippel@uk-augsburg.de.
  • Braun F; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany. Electronic address: franziska.braun@uk-augsburg.de.
  • Risch F; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany. Electronic address: franka.risch@uk-augsburg.de.
  • Woznicki P; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany. Electronic address: piotrekwoznicki@gmail.com.
  • Wollny C; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany. Electronic address: claudia.wollny@uk-augsburg.de.
  • Scheurig-Muenkler C; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany. Electronic address: christian.scheurig@uk-augsburg.de.
  • Kroencke TJ; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany. Electronic address: thomas.kroencke@uk-augsburg.de.
  • Schwarz F; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany; Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, 80539 Munich, Germany. Electronic address: florian.schwarz@uk-augsburg.de.
Eur J Radiol ; 148: 110181, 2022 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35121331
PURPOSE: To analyze the quantitative and qualitative image quality of low-dose CT scans of the abdomen on a novel photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) in comparison with a traditional energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT). METHODS: Consecutive patients with clinically indicated low-dose CT were scanned on a PCD-CT and compared with a BMI-matched EID-CT-cohort scanned during the same timeframe. Radiation dose, image noise, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were measured for each patient. Furthermore, image quality and conspicuity of abdominal structures (adrenal glands, mesenteric vessels, ureters, and renal pelvis) were assessed on 5-point Likert-scales (1 = very poor quality/not detectable; 5 = excellent quality/differentiability). RESULTS: Twenty patients (mean age 46.2 [range: 19-77]; 13 men) were included. Image noise was significantly lower (24.9 ± 3.3 vs. 31.4 ± 5.6 SD HU, p < 0.001) and SNR significantly higher (2.1 ± 0.3 vs. 1.5 ± 0.4; p < 0.001) on the PCD-CT. Subjective image quality was substantially higher (4.0 ± 0.3 vs. 3.1 ± 0.6; p < 0.001) and conspicuity better for the renal pelvis, ureters, and mesenteric vessels on the PCD-CT. There was no significant difference in the conspicuity of the adrenal glands. With increasing BMI (1st-4th BMI quartile), noise increased, and SNR decreased more strongly on the EID-CT than on the PCD-CT (ΔNoise: 39% vs. 2%, ΔSNR: -33% vs. -7% for EID-CT vs. PCD-CT, respectively) while radiation dose increased comparably (70 vs. 59%). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose CT scans of the abdomen performed on a novel PCD-CT exhibit reduced noise, higher SNR, increased subjective image quality, and superior conspicuity of abdominal fine structures compared to scans in comparable patients on an EID-CT.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Photons Type of study: Qualitative_research Limits: Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Eur J Radiol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Country of publication: Ireland

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Photons Type of study: Qualitative_research Limits: Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Eur J Radiol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Country of publication: Ireland