Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Towards identifying cancer patients at risk to miss out on psycho-oncological treatment via machine learning.
Günther, Moritz Philipp; Kirchebner, Johannes; Schulze, Jan Ben; von Känel, Roland; Euler, Sebastian.
Affiliation
  • Günther MP; Department of Consultation-Liaison-Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Kirchebner J; Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Schulze JB; Department of Consultation-Liaison-Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • von Känel R; Department of Consultation-Liaison-Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Euler S; Department of Consultation-Liaison-Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 31(2): e13555, 2022 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35137480
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

In routine oncological treatment settings, psychological distress, including mental disorders, is overlooked in 30% to 50% of patients. High workload and a constant need to optimise time and costs require a quick and easy method to identify patients likely to miss out on psychological support.

METHODS:

Using machine learning, factors associated with no consultation with a clinical psychologist or psychiatrist were identified between 2011 and 2019 in 7,318 oncological patients in a large cancer treatment centre. Parameters were hierarchically ordered based on statistical relevance. Nested resampling and cross validation were performed to avoid overfitting.

RESULTS:

Patients were least likely to receive psycho-oncological (i.e., psychiatric/psychotherapeutic) treatment when they were not formally screened for distress, had inpatient treatment for less than 28 days, had no psychiatric diagnosis, were aged 65 or older, had skin cancer or were not being discussed in a tumour board. The final validated model was optimised to maximise sensitivity at 85.9% and achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.75, a balanced accuracy of 68.5% and specificity of 51.2%.

CONCLUSION:

Beyond conventional screening tools, results might contribute to identify patients at risk to be neglected in terms of referral to psycho-oncology within routine oncological care.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Skin Neoplasms / Neoplasms Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Journal subject: ENFERMAGEM / NEOPLASIAS Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Switzerland

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Skin Neoplasms / Neoplasms Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Journal subject: ENFERMAGEM / NEOPLASIAS Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Switzerland
...