Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cognitive Assessment by Telemedicine: Reliability and Agreement between Face-to-Face and Remote Videoconference-Based Cognitive Tests in Older Adults Attending a Memory Clinic.
Hernandez, Herb Howard C; Ong, Poh Ling; Anthony, Philomena; Ang, Siew Ling; Salim, Nur Bazilah Mohd; Yew, Pey Ying Suzanne; Ali, Noorhazlina Bte; Lim, Jun Pei; Lim, Wee Shiong; Chew, Justin.
Affiliation
  • Hernandez HHC; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
  • Ong PL; Dementia Care, Nursing Specialty, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
  • Anthony P; Dementia Care, Nursing Specialty, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
  • Ang SL; Dementia Care, Nursing Specialty, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
  • Salim NBM; Dementia Care, Nursing Specialty, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
  • Yew PYS; Dementia Care, Nursing Specialty, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
  • Ali NB; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
  • Lim JP; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
  • Lim WS; Institute of Geriatrics and Active Ageing, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
  • Chew J; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Ann Geriatr Med Res ; 26(1): 42-48, 2022 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35236016
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has spurred the rapid adoption of telemedicine. However, the reproducibility of face-to-face (F2F) versus remote videoconference-based cognitive testing remains to be established. We assessed the reliability and agreement between F2F and remote administrations of the Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT), modified version of the Chinese Mini-Mental State Examination (mCMMSE), and Chinese Frontal Assessment Battery (CFAB) in older adults attending a memory clinic.

METHODS:

The participants underwent F2F followed by remote videoconference-based assessment by the same assessor within 3 weeks. Reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC; two-way mixed, absolute agreement), the mean difference between remote and F2F-based assessments using paired-sample t-tests, and agreement using Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS:

Fifty-six subjects (mean age, 76±5.4 years; 74% mild; 19% moderate dementia) completed the AMT and mCMMSE, of which 30 completed the CFAB. Good reliability was noted based on the ICC values-AMT ICC=0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.88; mCMMSE ICC=0.80, 95% CI 0.63-0.88; CFAB ICC=0.82, 95% CI 0.66-0.91. However, remote AMT and mCMMSE scores were higher compared to F2F-mean difference (i.e., remote minus F2F) AMT 0.3±1.1, p=0.03; mCMMSE 1.3±2.9, p=0.001. Significant differences were observed in the orientation and recall items of the mCMMSE and the similarities and conflicting instructions of CFAB. Bland-Altman plots indicated wide 95% limits of agreement (AMT -1.9 to 2.6; mCMMSE -4.3 to 6.9; CFAB -3.0 to 3.8), exceeding the a priori-defined levels of error.

CONCLUSION:

While the remote and F2F cognitive assessments demonstrated good overall reliability, the test scores were higher when performed remotely compared to F2F. The discrepancies in agreement warrant attention to patient selection and environment optimization for the successful adaptation of telemedicine for cognitive assessment.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Ann Geriatr Med Res Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Singapore

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Ann Geriatr Med Res Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Singapore