Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Research Priorities for Pediatric Intensive Care Nutrition Within the United Kingdom: A National Institute of Health Research James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.
O'Connor, Graeme; Marino, Luise V; Tume, Lyvonne N; Stewart, Alexandra; Gates, Simon; Lanigan, Julie; Bangalore, Harish; Kinsella, Suzannah.
Affiliation
  • O'Connor G; Department of Dietetics, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
  • Marino LV; Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Southampton Children's Hospital, University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Southampton, NIHR BRC Southampton and Faculty of Health Sciences University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
  • Tume LN; School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Manchester, United Kingdom.
  • Stewart A; Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
  • Gates S; Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
  • Lanigan J; Department of Physiotherapy, Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
  • Bangalore H; Department of Population, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching, Institute of Child Health University College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Kinsella S; Department of Paediatric Critical Care Medicine, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Crit Care Explor ; 4(3): e0649, 2022 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35265852
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To determine research priorities in PICU nutrition, which represent the shared priorities of patients, parents, carers, and PICU healthcare professionals within the United Kingdom.

DESIGN:

A national multiphase priority setting methodology in partnership with the James Lind Alliance delivered over 16 months (June 2020-September 2021). Part 1 a national scoping survey asked respondents to submit their research uncertainties related to PICU nutrition. Part 2 summarizing and evidence-checking the submitted uncertainties. Part 3 interim prioritization survey. Part 4 consensus workshop.

SETTING:

PICU.

PARTICIPANTS:

Patients, parents, and carers of patients who had been admitted to PICU, and PICU healthcare professionals involved in the treatment of these patients within the United Kingdom.

INTERVENTIONS:

None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS:

A national scoping survey asked respondents to submit their research uncertainties related to PICU nutrition. In the first survey, 165 topic ideas were suggested (12% by parents/carers and 88% by PICU healthcare professionals). These were categorized into 57 summary questions. The existing evidence was searched to ensure that the proposed summary questions had not already been answered. Forty were judged to be true uncertainties following a systematic literature review. These 40 uncertainties were grouped into eight themes for the second interim survey, which asked respondents to prioritize their top research questions. One hundred and forty participants contributed to this second interim survey. A final shortlist of 25 questions was derived, with the top 18 questions taken to a multistakeholder workshop where a consensus was reached on the top 10 priorities.

CONCLUSIONS:

This research identified important research gaps in the management of patients in PICU. Areas that need to be addressed as a priority include energy requirements in ventilated neonates, nutritional supplementation of probiotics to manage and prevent sepsis, the impact of postintensive care syndrome on nutrition and growth, and when to commence parenteral (IV) nutrition. The challenge now is to refine and deliver answers to these research priorities.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Crit Care Explor Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Crit Care Explor Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom
...