Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Value of Assessment of Different Neoplasias in the Adnexa in the Differential Diagnosis of Malignant Ovarian Tumor and Benign Ovarian Tumor: A Meta-analysis.
Yue, Xiang; Zhong, Lili; Wang, Yashan; Zhang, Chenyang; Chen, Xiaofei; Wang, Song; Hu, Jiayi; Hu, Junjun; Wang, Chunpeng; Liu, Xin.
Affiliation
  • Yue X; Second Bethune Clinical Medical College of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
  • Zhong L; Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory on Molecular and Chemical Genetics, Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
  • Wang Y; Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
  • Zhang C; Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
  • Chen X; Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
  • Wang S; Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
  • Hu J; Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
  • Hu J; Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
  • Wang C; School of Mathematics and Statistics, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China.
  • Liu X; Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, China. Electronic address: liuxinjlu01@163.com.
Ultrasound Med Biol ; 48(5): 730-742, 2022 05.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35272892
ABSTRACT
To evaluate the accuracy of the assessment of different neoplasias in the adnexa (ADNEX) model in the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign ovarian tumors, the optimal cutoff value and the accuracy in diagnosing ovarian tumors at different stages, PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were retrieved to search literature with per-patient analysis until publication of the last study in November 2021. STATA 14.1, Meta-Disc 1.4 and Revman software 5.3 were used in the performance of meta-analysis. To explore sources of heterogeneity, a subgroup analysis was conducted for the ADNEX model. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, positive likelihood, negative likelihood ratio and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-0.93), 0.84 (95% CI 0.80-0.88), 55.55 (95% CI 40.47-76.26), 5.71 (95% CI 4.49-7.26), 0.10 (95% CI 0.08-0.13) and 0.94 (95% CI 0.92-0.96) in differentiating benign and malignant ovarian tumors, respectively. The area under the curve in identifying benign, borderline, stage I and stages II-IV were 0.93, 0.73, 0.27 and 0.92. The ADNEX model had high diagnostic performance was influential in the diagnosis of benign and stage II-IV ovarian tumors.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ovarian Neoplasms Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ovarian Neoplasms Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China
...