Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Informing training needs for the revised certified clinical data manager (CCDMTM) exam: analysis of results from the previous exam.
Williams, Tremaine Brueon; Schmidtke, Carsten; Roessger, Kevin; Dieffenderfer, Vicki; Garza, Maryam; Zozus, Meredith.
Affiliation
  • Williams TB; Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
  • Schmidtke C; Department of Human Resource & Workforce Development, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.
  • Roessger K; Department of Adult and Lifelong Learning, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.
  • Dieffenderfer V; Department of Human Resource & Workforce Development, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.
  • Garza M; Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
  • Zozus M; Department of Population Health Sciences, Joe R. and Teresa Lozano Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
JAMIA Open ; 5(1): ooac010, 2022 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35274085
Objective: To inform training needs for the revised Certified Clinical Data Manager (CCDMTM) Exam. Introduction: Clinical data managers hold the responsibility for processing the data on which research conclusions and regulatory decisions are based, highlighting the importance of applying effective data management practices. The use of practice standards such as the Good Clinical Data Management Practices increases confidence in data, emphasizing that the study conclusions likely hold much more weight when utilizing standard practices. Methods: A quantitative, descriptive study, and application of classic test theory was undertaken to analyze past data from the CCDMTM Exam to identify potential training needs. Data across 952 sequential exam attempts were pooled for analysis. Results: Competency domain-level analysis identified training needs in 4 areas: design tasks; data processing tasks; programming tasks; and coordination and management tasks. Conclusions: Analysis of past CCDMTM Exam results using classic test theory identified training needs reflective of exam takers. Training in the identified areas could benefit CCDMTM Exam takers and improve their ability to apply effective data management practices. While this may not be reflective of individual or organizational needs, recommendations for assessing individual and organizational training needs are provided.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: JAMIA Open Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: JAMIA Open Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United States