Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Management of sagittal craniosynostosis: morphological comparison of eight surgical techniques.
Galiay, Leila; Hennocq, Quentin; Cross, Connor; Arnaud, Eric; Larysz, Dawid; Kölby, Lars; Paternoster, Giovanna; Khonsari, Roman H; Moazen, Mehran.
Affiliation
  • Galiay L; Department of Maxillo-Facial Surgery and Plastic Surgery, Necker - Enfants Malades University Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris 75015, France; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 7JE, UK.
  • Hennocq Q; Department of Maxillo-Facial Surgery and Plastic Surgery, Necker - Enfants Malades University Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris 75015, France.
  • Cross C; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 7JE, UK.
  • Arnaud E; Department of Neurosurgery, Craniofacial surgery unit, Necker - Enfants Malades University Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris 75015, France.
  • Larysz D; Department of Head and Neck Surgery for Children and Adolescents. University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn. Prof. St. Popowski Regional Specialized Children's Hospital. Ul. Zolnierska 18a, 10-561 Olsztyn, Poland.
  • Kölby L; Department of Plastic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg SE-413 45, Sweden.
  • Paternoster G; Department of Neurosurgery, Craniofacial surgery unit, Necker - Enfants Malades University Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris 75015, France.
  • Khonsari RH; Department of Maxillo-Facial Surgery and Plastic Surgery, Necker - Enfants Malades University Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris 75015, France; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 7JE, UK.
  • Moazen M; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 7JE, UK. Electronic address: m.moazen@ucl.ac.uk.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 60(4): 499-506, 2022 05.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35314080
The aim of this study was to carry out a retrospective multicentre study comparing the morphological outcome of 8 techniques used for the management of sagittal synostosis versus a large cohort of control patients. Computed tomographic (CT) images were obtained from children CT-scanned for non-craniosynostosis related events (n = 241) and SS patients at preoperative and postoperative follow-up stages (n = 101). No significant difference in morphological outcomes was observed between the techniques considered in this study. However, the majority of techniques showed a tendency for relapse. Further, the more invasive procedures at older ages seem to lead to larger intracranial volume compared to less invasive techniques at younger ages. This study can be a first step towards future multicentre studies, comparing surgical results and offering a possibility for objective benchmarking of outcomes between methods and centres.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Plastic Surgery Procedures / Craniosynostoses / Jaw Abnormalities Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Child / Humans / Infant Language: En Journal: Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg Year: 2022 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Plastic Surgery Procedures / Craniosynostoses / Jaw Abnormalities Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Child / Humans / Infant Language: En Journal: Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg Year: 2022 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom