Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Do 2 H and 18 O in leaf water reflect environmental drivers differently?
Cernusak, Lucas A; Barbeta, Adrià; Bush, Rosemary T; Eichstaedt Bögelein, Rebekka; Ferrio, Juan Pedro; Flanagan, Lawrence B; Gessler, Arthur; Martín-Gómez, Paula; Hirl, Regina T; Kahmen, Ansgar; Keitel, Claudia; Lai, Chun-Ta; Munksgaard, Niels C; Nelson, Daniel B; Ogée, Jérôme; Roden, John S; Schnyder, Hans; Voelker, Steven L; Wang, Lixin; Stuart-Williams, Hilary; Wingate, Lisa; Yu, Wusheng; Zhao, Liangju; Cuntz, Matthias.
Affiliation
  • Cernusak LA; College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, Qld, 4878, Australia.
  • Barbeta A; BEECA, Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, 08028, Spain.
  • Bush RT; Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.
  • Eichstaedt Bögelein R; Faculty of Regional and Environmental Sciences - Geobotany, University of Trier, Trier, 54296, Germany.
  • Ferrio JP; ARAID-Departamento de Sistemas Agrícolas, Forestales y Medio Ambiente, Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón (CITA), Zaragoza, 50059, Spain.
  • Flanagan LB; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, T1K 3M4, Canada.
  • Gessler A; WSL Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, Birmensdorf, 8903, Switzerland.
  • Martín-Gómez P; INRAE, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, UMR ISPA, Villenave d'Ornon 33140, France.
  • Hirl RT; Centre Tecnològic Forestal de Catalunya (CTFC), Solsona, Catalonia, 25280, Spain.
  • Kahmen A; Technische Universität München, Lehrstuhl für Grünlandlehre, Freising-Weihenstephan, 85354, Germany.
  • Keitel C; Department of Environmental Sciences-Botany, University of Basel, Basel, 4056, Switzerland.
  • Lai CT; School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Sydney Institute of Agriculture, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, 2006, Australia.
  • Munksgaard NC; Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, 92182, USA.
  • Nelson DB; College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, Qld, 4878, Australia.
  • Ogée J; Department of Environmental Sciences-Botany, University of Basel, Basel, 4056, Switzerland.
  • Roden JS; INRAE, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, UMR ISPA, Villenave d'Ornon 33140, France.
  • Schnyder H; Department of Biology, Southern Oregon University, Ashland, OR, 97520, USA.
  • Voelker SL; Technische Universität München, Lehrstuhl für Grünlandlehre, Freising-Weihenstephan, 85354, Germany.
  • Wang L; College of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, 49931, USA.
  • Stuart-Williams H; Department of Earth Sciences, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IND, 46202, USA.
  • Wingate L; Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
  • Yu W; INRAE, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, UMR ISPA, Villenave d'Ornon 33140, France.
  • Zhao L; Key Laboratory of Tibetan Environmental Changes and Land Surface Processes, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
  • Cuntz M; Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127, China.
New Phytol ; 235(1): 41-51, 2022 07.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35322882
ABSTRACT
We compiled hydrogen and oxygen stable isotope compositions (δ2 H and δ18 O) of leaf water from multiple biomes to examine variations with environmental drivers. Leaf water δ2 H was more closely correlated with δ2 H of xylem water or atmospheric vapour, whereas leaf water δ18 O was more closely correlated with air relative humidity. This resulted from the larger proportional range for δ2 H of meteoric waters relative to the extent of leaf water evaporative enrichment compared with δ18 O. We next expressed leaf water as isotopic enrichment above xylem water (Δ2 H and Δ18 O) to remove the impact of xylem water isotopic variation. For Δ2 H, leaf water still correlated with atmospheric vapour, whereas Δ18 O showed no such correlation. This was explained by covariance between air relative humidity and the Δ18 O of atmospheric vapour. This is consistent with a previously observed diurnal correlation between air relative humidity and the deuterium excess of atmospheric vapour across a range of ecosystems. We conclude that 2 H and 18 O in leaf water do indeed reflect the balance of environmental drivers differently; our results have implications for understanding isotopic effects associated with water cycling in terrestrial ecosystems and for inferring environmental change from isotopic biomarkers that act as proxies for leaf water.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Water / Ecosystem Language: En Journal: New Phytol Journal subject: BOTANICA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Water / Ecosystem Language: En Journal: New Phytol Journal subject: BOTANICA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia
...