Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of [18F]PSMA-1007 with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Restaging of Prostate Cancer Patients with PSA Relapse.
Hoffmann, Manuela A; von Eyben, Finn Edler; Fischer, Nicolas; Rosar, Florian; Müller-Hübenthal, Jonas; Buchholz, Hans-Georg; Wieler, Helmut J; Schreckenberger, Mathias.
Affiliation
  • Hoffmann MA; Department of Occupational Health & Safety, Federal Ministry of Defense, 53123 Bonn, Germany.
  • von Eyben FE; Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg University, 55101 Mainz, Germany.
  • Fischer N; Center for Tobacco Control Research, DK-5230 Odense, Denmark.
  • Rosar F; Department of Urology, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
  • Müller-Hübenthal J; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center, 66421 Homburg, Germany.
  • Buchholz HG; Practice of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Praxis im KölnTriangle, 50679 Cologne, Germany.
  • Wieler HJ; Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg University, 55101 Mainz, Germany.
  • Schreckenberger M; Medical Center, University of Dusseldorf, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(6)2022 Mar 14.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35326629
This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of [18F]PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) (18F-PSMA) and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (68Ga-PSMA) by identifying prostate-specific antigen (PSA) threshold levels for optimal detecting recurrent prostate cancer (PC) and to compare both methods. Retrospectively, the study included 264 patients. The performances of 18F-PSMA and 68Ga-PSMA in relation to the pre-scan PSA were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. 18F-PSMA showed PC-lesions in 87.5% (112/128 patients), while 68Ga-PSMA identified them in 88.9% (121/136). For 18F-PSMA biochemical recurrent (BCR) patients treated with radical prostatectomy (78/128, patient group: F-RP), a PSA of 1.08 ng/mL was found to be the optimal cut-off level for predicting positive and negative scans (AUC = 0.821; 95%, CI: 0.710−0.932), while for prostatectomized 68Ga-PSMA BCR-patients (89/136, patient group: Ga-RP), the cut-off was 1.84 ng/mL (AUC = 0.588; 95%, CI: 0.410−0.766). In patients with PSA < 1.08 ng/mL (F-RP) 76.3% and <1.84 ng/mL (Ga-RP) 78.6% scans were positive, whereas patients with PSA ≥ 1.08 ng/mL (F-RP) or 1.84 ng/mL (Ga-RP) had positive scan results in 100% and 91.5% (p < 0.001/p = 0.085). The identified PSA thresholds for PSMA-mappable PC lesions in BCR-patients (RP) showed a better separation for 18F-PSMA with regard to the distinguishing of positive and negative PC-lesions compared to 68Ga-PSMA. However, the two PSMA PET/CT tracers gave similar overall findings.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Cancers (Basel) Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany Country of publication: Switzerland

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Cancers (Basel) Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany Country of publication: Switzerland