Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development and initial validation of the falls health literacy scale.
Lim, Mei Ling; van Schooten, Kimberley S; Radford, Kylie A; Delbaere, Kim.
Affiliation
  • Lim ML; Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia; School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
  • van Schooten KS; Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia; School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
  • Radford KA; Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia; School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
  • Delbaere K; Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia; School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: k.delbaere@neura.edu.au.
Maturitas ; 159: 40-45, 2022 05.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35337611
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

(i) To develop the Falls Health Literacy Scale (FHLS), a health literacy tool specific to falls, (ii) to evaluate the FHLS's construct validity towards differentiating individuals with different fall-related health literacy, and (iii) to determine its reliability, construct validity and structure in an older population.

METHODS:

The initial FHLS, developed based on Sørensen et al.'s health literacy model, was first administered to 144 participants aged ≥18 years for feedback and scale improvement and preliminary analysis to determine the FHLS's construct validity in identifying individuals with different fall-related health literacy. After scale refinement, the FHLS was validated in 227 community-living people aged ≥65 years.

RESULTS:

Adult participants with more fall prevention knowledge scored higher on the initial FHLS than those with less fall prevention knowledge (p≤0.001). The final FHLS includes a 25-item subjective and a 14-item objective scale. Older people with ≥1 fall in the past year reported lower FHLS-subjective scores than those who had no falls (Cohen's [d]=0.29, confidence interval [CI]0.03-0.56, p=0.03). Older people with lower levels of education had lower FHLS-objective scores than their more educated counterparts (d=0.51, CI0.38-1.43, p≤0.001). Factor analysis of the FHLS-subjective generated six subscales, with CFA showing adequate model fit (RMSEA=0.077, CFI=0.883 and χ2/df =2.35). FHLS-subjective (25-item) showed good reliability, with Cronbach's alpha=0.93, mean inter-item correlation=0.34 (range -0.03-0.81) and intra-class coefficient =0.86 (95% CI0.69-0.93).

CONCLUSION:

The novel, context-specific FHLS displayed good construct validity and reliability. The FHLS holds promise as a screening tool to differentiate individuals with different degrees of fall-related health literacy, which may help guide fall prevention interventions.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Literacy Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Humans Language: En Journal: Maturitas Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Literacy Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Humans Language: En Journal: Maturitas Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia