Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Positive Patient Experience: A Comprehensive Analysis of Plastic Surgery Online Reviews.
Chang, Irene A; Wells, Michael W; Chang, Ian A; Arquette, Connor P; Tang, Cathy J; Gatherwright, James R; Furnas, Heather J.
Affiliation
  • Chang IA; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Wells MW; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Chang IA; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  • Arquette CP; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Tang CJ; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
  • Gatherwright JR; Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Akron, OH, USA.
  • Furnas HJ; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Aesthet Surg J ; 42(9): 1083-1093, 2022 08 24.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35417545
BACKGROUND: Subjective online physician evaluation is an important component of patient decision-making. Understanding reviews may improve satisfaction and build positive online reputation. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the top predictive factors driving patient satisfaction across the most popular plastic surgery procedures. METHODS: Online reviews were analyzed from RealSelf, Yelp, and Google for the 5 highest-rated plastic surgeons in 6 US metropolitan areas. Blank, non-English, consultation, duplicate, and unrelated reviews were excluded. Data from free-text reviews included physician rating, patient-reported reasons for rating, procedure, and complications. Univariate analysis was performed to compare predictive factors of online ratings. RESULTS: In total, 11,078 reviews were included. RealSelf had the highest average rating (4.77), and Yelp had the lowest (4.66). Reviews in Miami, Philadelphia, New York City, and Chicago were mostly published on RealSelf, whereas Houston and Los Angeles mostly used Google and Yelp, respectively. Reconstructive procedures were rated significantly higher than cosmetic procedures (P = 0.035). Aesthetic appearance was the strongest predictor of rating across all procedures. Buccal fat removal (98.8%) and abdominoplasty (98.1%) had the highest satisfaction, and Brazilian butt lift had the lowest (88.2%) (P < 0.001). Additional significant contributors included staff interaction, bedside manner, health outcomes, complications, and postoperative care (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although aesthetic outcome is an important predictor of satisfaction, other aspects of care, such as bedside manner and staff interaction, provide an important foundation of support. Excellent patient-surgeon communication and postoperative care may mitigate patient dissatisfaction and elicit high-satisfaction online patient reviews.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Surgery, Plastic / Abdominoplasty / Surgeons Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Aesthet Surg J Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Surgery, Plastic / Abdominoplasty / Surgeons Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Aesthet Surg J Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United kingdom