Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A systematic review on the usability of robotic and virtual reality devices in neuromotor rehabilitation: patients' and healthcare professionals' perspective.
Zanatta, Francesco; Giardini, Anna; Pierobon, Antonia; D'Addario, Marco; Steca, Patrizia.
Affiliation
  • Zanatta F; Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
  • Giardini A; Information Technology Department, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
  • Pierobon A; Psychology Unit of Montescano Institute, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Montescano, Italy. antonia.pierobon@icsmaugeri.it.
  • D'Addario M; Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
  • Steca P; Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 22(1): 523, 2022 Apr 20.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35443710
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The application of virtual reality (VR) and robotic devices in neuromotor rehabilitation has provided promising evidence in terms of efficacy, so far. Usability evaluations of these technologies have been conducted extensively, but no overviews on this topic have been reported yet.

METHODS:

A systematic review of the studies on patients' and healthcare professionals' perspective through searching of PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsychINFO (2000 to 2021) was conducted. Descriptive data regarding the study design, participants, technological devices, interventions, and quantitative and qualitative usability evaluations were extracted and meta-synthetized.

RESULTS:

Sixty-eight studies were included. VR devices were perceived as having good usability and as a tool promoting patients' engagement and motivation during the treatment, as well as providing strong potential for customized rehabilitation sessions. By contrast, they suffered from the effect of learnability and were judged as potentially requiring more mental effort. Robotics implementation received positive feedback along with high satisfaction and perceived safety throughout the treatment. Robot-assisted rehabilitation was considered useful as it supported increased treatment intensity and contributed to improved patients' physical independence and psychosocial well-being. Technical and design-related issues may limit the applicability making the treatment difficult and physically straining. Moreover, cognitive and communication deficits were remarked as potential barriers.

CONCLUSIONS:

Overall, VR and robotic devices have been perceived usable so far, reflecting good acceptance in neuromotor rehabilitation programs. The limitations raised by the participants should be considered to further improve devices applicability and maximise technological rehabilitation effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration ref. CRD42021224141 .
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Robotics / Virtual Reality Type of study: Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Journal subject: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Italy

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Robotics / Virtual Reality Type of study: Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Journal subject: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Italy