Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sensitivity of three thyrotropin receptor antibody assays in thyroid-associated orbitopathy.
Saric-Matutinovic, Marija; Diana, Tanja; Nedeljkovic-Beleslin, Biljana; Ciric, Jasmina; Zarkovic, Milos; Perovic-Blagojevic, Iva; Kahaly, George J; Ignjatovic, Svetlana.
Affiliation
  • Saric-Matutinovic M; University of Belgrade, Faculty of Pharmacy, Belgrade.
  • Diana T; Johannes Gutenberg University (JGU) Medical Center, Department of Medicine I, Molecular Thyroid Research Laboratory, Mainz, Germany.
  • Nedeljkovic-Beleslin B; University Clinical Center of Serbia, Clinic for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders, Belgrade.
  • Ciric J; University Clinical Center of Serbia, Clinic for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders, Belgrade.
  • Zarkovic M; University Clinical Center of Serbia, Clinic for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders, Belgrade.
  • Perovic-Blagojevic I; Clinical Hospital Center 'Dr Dragisa Misovic-Dedinje', Service for laboratory diagnostics, Belgrade.
  • Kahaly GJ; Johannes Gutenberg University (JGU) Medical Center, Department of Medicine I, Molecular Thyroid Research Laboratory, Mainz, Germany.
  • Ignjatovic S; University of Belgrade, Faculty of Pharmacy, Belgrade.
J Med Biochem ; 41(2): 211-220, 2022 Apr 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35510209
Background: Thyrotropin receptor autoantibodies (TSH-RAb) are indispensable biomarkers in the laboratory assessment of thyroid-associated orbitopathy (TAO). Clinical sensitivity of three different assays for TSH-R-Ab determination was evaluated in patients with TAO. Methods: 87 consecutive TAO patients were enrolled and their serum samples analyzed in parallel with three assays. An ECLIA competitive binding and a chemiluminescent bridge immunoassay were used to measure total and binding TSH-R-Ab concentration, while their functional activity was determined using a stimulatory TSH-R-Ab (TSAb) cellbased bioassay. Results: Compared to the two binding assays (ECLIA p<0.001, bridge p=0.003), the TSAb bioassay was more sensitive pertaining to the positive detection of TSH-R-Ab in TAO patients. No difference (p=0.057) was noted between the ECLIA and bridge assays regarding sensitivity rate. All patients with active and/or moderate-to-severe TAO tested positive in the TSAb bioassay (100% and 100%, respectively), while the positivity rates for bridge and ECLIA binding assays were 89.7% and 82.1% for active TAO, and 90.2% and 86.3% for severe TAO, respectively. Negative predictive values of the bioassay, bridge, and ECLIA assays were 100%, 75%, and 71%, respectively for active TAO, and 100%, 86%, and 71%, respectively for moderate-to-severe TAO. The superiority of the bioassay was most prominent in euthyroid (ET) TAO. Positivity rates of the TSAb bioassay, bridge and ECLIA binding assays were 89.6%, 75%, and 64.6%, respectively for inactive TAO; 86.1%, 69.4%, and 52.8%, respectively for mild TAO; 87.5%, 62.5%, and 12.5%, respectively for euthyroid TAO. The bridge assay correlated better with the ECLIA binding assay (r=0.893, p<0.001), compared to the bioassay (r=0.669, p<0.001). Conclusions: In patients with TAO of various activity and severity, the TSAb bioassay demonstrates a superior clinical performance compared to both ECLIA and bridge binding assays.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: J Med Biochem Year: 2022 Document type: Article Country of publication: Serbia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: J Med Biochem Year: 2022 Document type: Article Country of publication: Serbia