Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
LOw-dose CT Or Lung UltraSonography versus standard of care based-strategies for the diagnosis of pneumonia in the elderly: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (OCTOPLUS).
Prendki, Virginie; Garin, Nicolas; Stirnemann, Jerome; Combescure, Christophe; Platon, Alexandra; Bernasconi, Enos; Sauter, Thomas; Hautz, Wolf.
Affiliation
  • Prendki V; Division of Internal Medicine for the Aged, Geneva University Hospitals, Thônex, Switzerland virginie.prendki@hcuge.ch.
  • Garin N; Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Stirnemann J; Division of General Internal Medicine, Riviera Chablais Hospitals, Rennaz, Switzerland.
  • Combescure C; Department of Internal Medicine Specialties, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Platon A; Department of Internal Medicine Specialties, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Bernasconi E; Department of Health and Community Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneve, Switzerland.
  • Sauter T; Diagnostic Department, Division of Radiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Hautz W; Division of Infectious Diseases, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, University of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland.
BMJ Open ; 12(5): e055869, 2022 05 06.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35523502
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Pneumonia is a leading cause of mortality and a common indication for antibiotic in elderly patients. However, its diagnosis is often inaccurate. We aim to compare the diagnostic accuracy, the clinical and cost outcomes and the use of antibiotics associated with three imaging strategies in patients >65 years old with suspected pneumonia in the emergency room (ER) chest X-ray (CXR, standard of care), low-dose CT scan (LDCT) or lung ultrasonography (LUS). METHODS AND

ANALYSIS:

This is a multicentre randomised superiority clinical trial with three parallel arms. Patients will be allocated in the ER to a diagnostic strategy based on either CXR, LDCT or LUS. All three imaging modalities will be performed but the results of two of them will be masked during 5 days to the patients, the physicians in charge of the patients and the investigators according to random allocation. The primary objective is to compare the accuracy of LDCT versus CXR-based strategies. As secondary objectives, antibiotics prescription, clinical and cost outcomes will be compared, and the same analyses repeated to compare the LUS and CXR strategies. The reference diagnosis will be established a posteriori by a panel of experts. Based on a previous study, we expect an improvement of 16% of the accuracy of pneumonia diagnosis using LDCT instead of CXR. Under this assumption, and accounting for 10% of drop-out, the enrolment of 495 patients is needed to prove the superiority of LDCT over CRX (alpha error=0.05, beta error=0.10). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval CER Geneva 2019-01288. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04978116.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia / Standard of Care Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Aspects: Ethics Limits: Aged / Humans Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Switzerland

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia / Standard of Care Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Aspects: Ethics Limits: Aged / Humans Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Switzerland
...