Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The role of Australian clinical quality registries in pregnancy care: A scoping review.
Campion, Tarun Sai David; Daly, J Oliver; Wake, Melissa; Ahern, Susannah; Said, Joanne M.
Affiliation
  • Campion TSD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Daly JO; Joan Kirner Women's & Children's at Sunshine Hospital, Western Health, St Albans, Victoria, Australia.
  • Wake M; Population Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Ahern S; Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Said JM; Liggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 62(4): 472-482, 2022 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35538882
BACKGROUND: Pregnancy represents a time of increased morbidity and mortality for women and their infants. Clinical quality registries (CQRs) collect, analyse and report key healthcare quality indicators for patient cohorts to improve patient care. There are limited data regarding existing CQRs in pregnancy. This scoping review aimed to: (1) identify Australian CQRs specific to pregnancy care and describe their general characteristics; and (2) outline their aims and measured outcomes METHODS: The scoping review was undertaken according to Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. CQRs were identified using a systematic approach from publications (Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar), peer consultation, the Australian register of clinical registries and web searches. Details surrounding general characteristics, aims and outcomes were collated. RESULTS: We identified two primary sources of information about pregnancy care. (1) Six CQRs are specific to pregnancy (Australia and New Zealand twin-twin transfusion syndrome registry, Australian Pregnancy Register for women with epilepsy and those taking anti-epileptic drugs, National Register of Antipsychotic Medication in Pregnancy, Australasian Maternity Outcomes Surveillance System, Neonatal Alloimmune Thrombocytopaenia Registry and the Diabetes in Pregnancy clinical register). (2) Fourteen observational cohort studies were facilitated by non-pregnancy-specific CQRs where a subsection of patients underwent pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Australian CQRs currently report varied information regarding some selected conditions during pregnancy and offer therapeutic and epidemiological insight into their care. Further research into their effectiveness is warranted. We note the lack of a CQR spanning the common problems of pregnancy in general, where significant health, service and economic gains are possible.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prenatal Care / Quality Indicators, Health Care Type of study: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Female / Humans / Infant / Newborn / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: Australia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prenatal Care / Quality Indicators, Health Care Type of study: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Female / Humans / Infant / Newborn / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: Australia