Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Timely cancer genetic counseling and testing for young women with breast cancer: impact on surgical decision-making for contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy.
Dettwyler, Shenin A; Thull, Darcy L; McAuliffe, Priscilla F; Steiman, Jennifer G; Johnson, Ronald R; Diego, Emilia J; Mai, Phuong L.
Affiliation
  • Dettwyler SA; UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital (Cancer Genetics Program), Pittsburgh, PA, USA. shenin.dettwyler@nyulangone.org.
  • Thull DL; Currently at NYU Langone Health (The Pancreatic Cancer Center), New York, NY, USA. shenin.dettwyler@nyulangone.org.
  • McAuliffe PF; UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital (Cancer Genetics Program), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Steiman JG; UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital (Magee-Womens Surgical Associates), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Johnson RR; UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital (Magee-Womens Surgical Associates), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Diego EJ; UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital (Magee-Womens Surgical Associates), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Mai PL; UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital (Magee-Womens Surgical Associates), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 194(2): 393-401, 2022 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35596825
PURPOSE: Genetic testing (GT) can identify individuals with pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PV/LPVs) in breast cancer (BC) predisposition genes, who may consider contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy (CRRM). We report on CRRM rates in young women newly diagnosed with BC who received GT through a multidisciplinary clinic. METHODS: Clinical data were reviewed for patients seen between November 2014 and June 2019. Patients with non-metastatic, unilateral BC diagnosed at age ≤ 45 and completed GT prior to surgery were included. Associations between surgical intervention and age, BC stage, family history, and GT results were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 194 patients, 30 (15.5%) had a PV/LPV in a BC predisposition gene (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, NBN, NF1), with 66.7% in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Of 164 (84.5%) uninformative results, 132 (68%) were negative and 32 (16.5%) were variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Overall, 67 (34.5%) had CRRM, including 25/30 (83.3%) PV/LPV carriers and 42/164 (25.6%) non-carriers. A positive test result (p < 0.01) and significant family history were associated with CRRM (p = 0.02). For the 164 with uninformative results, multivariate analysis showed that CRRM was not associated with age (p = 0.23), a VUS, (p = 0.08), family history (p = 0.10), or BC stage (p = 0.11). CONCLUSION: In this cohort of young women with BC, the identification of a PV/LPV in a BC predisposition gene and a significant family history were associated with the decision to pursue CRRM. Thus, incorporation of genetic services in the initial evaluation of young patients with a new BC could contribute to the surgical decision-making process.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Mastectomy Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Mastectomy Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: Netherlands