Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How does re-classification of variants of unknown significance (VUS) impact the management of patients at risk for hereditary breast cancer?
Kwong, Ava; Ho, Cecilia Yuen Sze; Shin, Vivian Yvonne; Au, Chun Hang; Chan, Tsun-Leung; Ma, Edmond Shiu Kwan.
Affiliation
  • Kwong A; Chief of Breast Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong and University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR. akwong@asiabreastregistry.com.
  • Ho CYS; Department of Surgery, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR. akwong@asiabreastregistry.com.
  • Shin VY; Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, Shau Kei Wan, Hong Kong SAR. akwong@asiabreastregistry.com.
  • Au CH; Department of Molecular Pathology, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR.
  • Chan TL; Chief of Breast Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong and University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR.
  • Ma ESK; Department of Molecular Pathology, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR.
BMC Med Genomics ; 15(1): 122, 2022 05 31.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35641994
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The popularity of multigene testing increases the probability of identifying variants of uncertain significance (VUS). While accurate variant interpretation enables clinicians to be better informed of the genetic risk of their patients, currently, there is a lack of consensus management guidelines for clinicians on VUS.

METHODS:

Among the BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations screening in 3,544 subjects, 236 unique variants (BRCA1 86; BRCA2 150) identified in 459 patients were being reviewed. These variants consist of 231 VUS and 5 likely benign variants at the initial classification.

RESULTS:

The variants in 31.8% (146/459) patients were reclassified during the review, which involved 26 unique variants (11.0%). Also, 31 probands (6.8%) and their family members were offered high-risk surveillance and related management after these variants were reclassified to pathogenic or likely pathogenic. At the same time, 69 probands (15%) had their VUS downgraded to cancer risk equivalent to the general population level.

CONCLUSION:

A review of archival variants from BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing changed the management for 31.8% of the families due to increased or reduced risk. We encourage regular updates of variant databases, reference to normal population and collaboration between research laboratories on functional studies to define the clinical significances of VUS better.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ovarian Neoplasms / Breast Neoplasms Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: BMC Med Genomics Journal subject: GENETICA MEDICA Year: 2022 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ovarian Neoplasms / Breast Neoplasms Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: BMC Med Genomics Journal subject: GENETICA MEDICA Year: 2022 Document type: Article