Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A National Survey Comparing Patients' and Transplant Professionals' Research Priorities in the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study.
Beckmann, Sonja; Mauthner, Oliver; Schick, Liz; Rochat, Jessica; Lovis, Christian; Boehler, Annette; Binet, Isabelle; Huynh-Do, Uyen; De Geest, Sabina.
Affiliation
  • Beckmann S; Department Public Health, Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Mauthner O; Center Clinical Nursing Science, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Schick L; Department Public Health, Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Rochat J; University Department of Geriatric Medicine Felix Platter, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Lovis C; Swisstransplant, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Boehler A; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Binet I; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Huynh-Do U; Division of Medical Information Sciences, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • De Geest S; University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Transpl Int ; 35: 10255, 2022.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35664427
ABSTRACT
We aimed to identify, assess, compare and map research priorities of patients and professionals in the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study. The project followed 3 steps. 1) Focus group interviews identified patients' (n = 22) research priorities. 2) A nationwide survey assessed and compared the priorities in 292 patients and 175 professionals. 3) Priorities were mapped to the 4 levels of Bronfenbrenner's ecological framework. The 13 research priorities (financial pressure, medication taking, continuity of care, emotional well-being, return to work, trustful relationships, person-centredness, organization of care, exercise and physical fitness, graft functioning, pregnancy, peer contact and public knowledge of transplantation), addressed all framework levels patient (n = 7), micro (n = 3), meso (n = 2), and macro (n = 1). Comparing each group's top 10 priorities revealed that continuity of care received highest importance rating from both (92.2% patients, 92.5% professionals), with 3 more agreements between the groups. Otherwise, perspectives were more diverse than congruent Patients emphasized patient level priorities (emotional well-being, graft functioning, return to work), professionals those on the meso level (continuity of care, organization of care). Patients' research priorities highlighted a need to expand research to the micro, meso and macro level. Discrepancies should be recognized to avoid understudying topics that are more important to professionals than to patients.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Research Type of study: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Transpl Int Journal subject: TRANSPLANTE Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Switzerland

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Research Type of study: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Transpl Int Journal subject: TRANSPLANTE Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Switzerland