Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An audit of US FDA warning letters issued to sponsors, institutional review boards and investigators over a six-year period.
Saxena, Unnati; Bose, Debdipta; Saha, Shruti; Gogtay, Nithya J; Thatte, Urmila M.
Affiliation
  • Saxena U; Senior Resident Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth GSMC and KEM Hospital, Donde Marg, Parel, Mumbai, INDIA.
  • Bose D; Assistant Professor, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth GSMC and KEM Hospital, Donde Marg, Parel, Mumbai, INDIA.
  • Saha S; Senior Resident, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth GSMC and KEM Hospital, Donde Marg, Parel, Mumbai, INDIA.
  • Gogtay NJ; Professor & Head, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth GSMC and KEM Hospital, Donde Marg, Parel, Mumbai, INDIA.
  • Thatte UM; Professor Emeritus, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth GSMC and KEM Hospital, Donde Marg, Parel, Mumbai, INDIA.
Indian J Med Ethics ; VII(2): 108-113, 2022.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35765256
The present audit was carried out with the objective of evaluating warning letters (WLs) issued to trial sponsors, clinical investigators and institutional review boards (IRBs) by the United States Food and Drug Administration during a six-year period and compare it with two similar earlier audits. WLs were reviewed and classified as per stakeholders and further categorised as per predefined violation themes. The chi-square test was performed for trend analysis of WLs. A total of 62 WLs were issued to the three stakeholders. The maximum number of WLs were issued to the clinical investigators (36/62, 58.06%), followed by sponsors (19/62, 30.64%), and least to the IRBs (7/62, 11.29%). Among sponsors, lack of standard operating procedures for the monitoring, receipt, evaluation and reporting of post-marketing adverse drug events was the most common violation theme (8/19, 42.1%). Among clinical investigators, deviation from investigational plan was the most common violation theme (31/36, 86.11%.). For IRBs, inadequate documentation was the most common violation theme (6/7, 85.71%). We saw an overall reduction in the number of WLs issued to the stakeholders. Thus, we identified multiple areas on which each stakeholder should work for improvement.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ethics Committees, Research / Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Indian J Med Ethics Journal subject: ETICA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: India Country of publication: India

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ethics Committees, Research / Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Indian J Med Ethics Journal subject: ETICA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: India Country of publication: India