Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Age-friendly interventions in rural and remote areas: A scoping review.
Montayre, Jed; Foster, Jann; Zhao, Ivy Yan; Kong, Ariana; Leung, Angela Y M; Molassiotis, Alex; Officer, Alana; Mikton, Christopher; Neville, Stephen.
Affiliation
  • Montayre J; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Foster J; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Zhao IY; World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Community Health Services, School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR.
  • Kong A; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Leung AYM; World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Community Health Services, School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR.
  • Molassiotis A; World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Community Health Services, School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR.
  • Officer A; Department of Social Determinants of Health, Division of Healthier Populations, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Mikton C; Department of Social Determinants of Health, Division of Healthier Populations, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Neville S; Nursing Department, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Australas J Ageing ; 41(4): 490-500, 2022 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35796240
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

In 2007, the World Health Organization published a guide on age-friendly cities. However, little is known about interventions that have been implemented to promote age-friendly communities in rural and remote areas. This paper presents the findings from a scoping review undertaken to locate available evidence of interventions, strategies, and programs that have been implemented in rural and remote areas to create age-friendly communities.

METHODS:

This scoping review used the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology.

RESULTS:

A total of 219 articles were included in this review. No intervention studies were referred to as 'age-friendly'. However, there were interventions (mostly healthcare-related) that have been implemented in rural and remote areas with older people as participants. There were also non-evaluated community programs that were published in the grey literature. This review identified the common health interventions in older people and the indirect relevance to the WHO age-friendly framework domains in rural and remote contexts.

CONCLUSIONS:

The eight age-friendly domains were not explicitly utilised as a guide in the development of interventions for older people in rural and remote settings. Implementation of age-friendly interventions in rural and remote areas requires a multisectoral approach that is tailored to address the specific needs of individual communities. Age-friendly interventions also need to consider socio-ecological factors to adequately and holistically address community needs and ensure long-term sustainability.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rural Population / Delivery of Health Care Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limits: Aged / Humans Language: En Journal: Australas J Ageing Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rural Population / Delivery of Health Care Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limits: Aged / Humans Language: En Journal: Australas J Ageing Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia
...