Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Medical Segmentation Decathlon.
Antonelli, Michela; Reinke, Annika; Bakas, Spyridon; Farahani, Keyvan; Kopp-Schneider, Annette; Landman, Bennett A; Litjens, Geert; Menze, Bjoern; Ronneberger, Olaf; Summers, Ronald M; van Ginneken, Bram; Bilello, Michel; Bilic, Patrick; Christ, Patrick F; Do, Richard K G; Gollub, Marc J; Heckers, Stephan H; Huisman, Henkjan; Jarnagin, William R; McHugo, Maureen K; Napel, Sandy; Pernicka, Jennifer S Golia; Rhode, Kawal; Tobon-Gomez, Catalina; Vorontsov, Eugene; Meakin, James A; Ourselin, Sebastien; Wiesenfarth, Manuel; Arbeláez, Pablo; Bae, Byeonguk; Chen, Sihong; Daza, Laura; Feng, Jianjiang; He, Baochun; Isensee, Fabian; Ji, Yuanfeng; Jia, Fucang; Kim, Ildoo; Maier-Hein, Klaus; Merhof, Dorit; Pai, Akshay; Park, Beomhee; Perslev, Mathias; Rezaiifar, Ramin; Rippel, Oliver; Sarasua, Ignacio; Shen, Wei; Son, Jaemin; Wachinger, Christian; Wang, Liansheng.
Affiliation
  • Antonelli M; School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK. michela.antonelli@kcl.ac.uk.
  • Reinke A; Div. Computer Assisted Medical Interventions, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Bakas S; HI Helmholtz Imaging, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Farahani K; Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Kopp-Schneider A; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Landman BA; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Litjens G; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Menze B; Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, National Cancer Institute (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Ronneberger O; Div. Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Summers RM; Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • van Ginneken B; Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Bilello M; Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Bilic P; DeepMind, London, UK.
  • Christ PF; Imaging Biomarkers and Computer-Aided Diagnosis Laboratory, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Do RKG; Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Gollub MJ; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Heckers SH; Department of Informatics, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
  • Huisman H; Department of Informatics, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
  • Jarnagin WR; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • McHugo MK; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Napel S; Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Pernicka JSG; Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Rhode K; Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Tobon-Gomez C; Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Vorontsov E; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Meakin JA; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Ourselin S; School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Wiesenfarth M; School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Arbeláez P; Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
  • Bae B; Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Chen S; School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Daza L; Div. Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Feng J; Universidad de los Andes, Bogota, Colombia.
  • He B; VUNO Inc., Seoul, Korea.
  • Isensee F; Tencent Jarvis Lab, Shenzhen, China.
  • Ji Y; Universidad de los Andes, Bogota, Colombia.
  • Jia F; Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
  • Kim I; Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
  • Maier-Hein K; HI Applied Computer Vision Lab, Division of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Merhof D; Department of Computer Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
  • Pai A; Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
  • Park B; Kakao Brain, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.
  • Perslev M; Cerebriu A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Rezaiifar R; Pattern Analysis and Learning Group, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Rippel O; Institute of Imaging & Computer Vision, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
  • Sarasua I; Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen, Germany.
  • Shen W; Cerebriu A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Son J; Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Wachinger C; VUNO Inc., Seoul, Korea.
  • Wang L; Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nat Commun ; 13(1): 4128, 2022 07 15.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35840566
International challenges have become the de facto standard for comparative assessment of image analysis algorithms. Although segmentation is the most widely investigated medical image processing task, the various challenges have been organized to focus only on specific clinical tasks. We organized the Medical Segmentation Decathlon (MSD)-a biomedical image analysis challenge, in which algorithms compete in a multitude of both tasks and modalities to investigate the hypothesis that a method capable of performing well on multiple tasks will generalize well to a previously unseen task and potentially outperform a custom-designed solution. MSD results confirmed this hypothesis, moreover, MSD winner continued generalizing well to a wide range of other clinical problems for the next two years. Three main conclusions can be drawn from this study: (1) state-of-the-art image segmentation algorithms generalize well when retrained on unseen tasks; (2) consistent algorithmic performance across multiple tasks is a strong surrogate of algorithmic generalizability; (3) the training of accurate AI segmentation models is now commoditized to scientists that are not versed in AI model training.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Algorithms / Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Language: En Journal: Nat Commun Journal subject: BIOLOGIA / CIENCIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Algorithms / Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Language: En Journal: Nat Commun Journal subject: BIOLOGIA / CIENCIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom