Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development of cognitive control during adolescence: The integrative effects of family socioeconomic status and parenting behaviors.
Li, Mengjiao; Lindenmuth, Morgan; Tarnai, Kathryn; Lee, Jacob; King-Casas, Brooks; Kim-Spoon, Jungmeen; Deater-Deckard, Kirby.
Affiliation
  • Li M; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.
  • Lindenmuth M; Department of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
  • Tarnai K; Department of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
  • Lee J; Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
  • King-Casas B; Department of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA; Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
  • Kim-Spoon J; Department of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
  • Deater-Deckard K; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA. Electronic address: kdeaterdeck@umass.edu.
Dev Cogn Neurosci ; 57: 101139, 2022 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35905528
Cognitive control is of great interest to researchers and practitioners. The concurrent association between family socioeconomic status (SES) and adolescent cognitive control is well-documented. However, little is known about whether and how SES relates to individual differences in the development of adolescent cognitive control. The current four-year longitudinal investigation (N = 167, 13-14 years at Wave 1) used multi-source interference task performance (reaction time in interference correct trials minus neutral correct trials) and corresponding neural activities (blood oxygen level dependent contrast of interference versus neutral conditions) as measures of cognitive control. SES and parenting behaviors (warmth, monitoring) were measured through surveys. We examined direct and indirect effects of earlier SES on the development of cognitive control via parenting behaviors; the moderating effect of parenting also was explored. Results of latent growth modeling (LGM) revealed significant interactive effects between SES and parenting predicting behavioral and neural measures of cognitive control. Lower family SES was associated with poorer cognitive performance when coupled with low parental warmth. In contrast, higher family SES was associated with greater improvement in performance, as well as a higher intercept and steeper decrease in frontoparietal activation over time, when coupled with high parental monitoring. These findings extend prior cross-sectional evidence to show the moderating effect of the parenting environment on the potential effects of SES on developmental changes in adolescent cognitive control.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude Language: En Journal: Dev Cogn Neurosci Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude Language: En Journal: Dev Cogn Neurosci Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: Netherlands