Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prevalence of bacterial coinfection and patterns of antibiotics prescribing in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Alshaikh, Faisal Salman; Godman, Brian; Sindi, Oula Nawaf; Seaton, R Andrew; Kurdi, Amanj.
Affiliation
  • Alshaikh FS; Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Science (SIPBS), University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
  • Godman B; Pharmaceutical Services, Bahrain Defence Force Military Hospital, Riffa, Kingdom of Bahrain.
  • Sindi ON; Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Science (SIPBS), University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
  • Seaton RA; Division of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa.
  • Kurdi A; Centre of Medical and Bio-allied Health Sciences Research, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
PLoS One ; 17(8): e0272375, 2022.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35913964
BACKGROUND: Evidence around prevalence of bacterial coinfection and pattern of antibiotic use in COVID-19 is controversial although high prevalence rates of bacterial coinfection have been reported in previous similar global viral respiratory pandemics. Early data on the prevalence of antibiotic prescribing in COVID-19 indicates conflicting low and high prevalence of antibiotic prescribing which challenges antimicrobial stewardship programmes and increases risk of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). AIM: To determine current prevalence of bacterial coinfection and antibiotic prescribing in COVID-19 patients. DATA SOURCE: OVID MEDLINE, OVID EMBASE, Cochrane and MedRxiv between January 2020 and June 2021. STUDY ELIGIBILITY: English language studies of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients which reported (a) prevalence of bacterial coinfection and/or (b) prevalence of antibiotic prescribing with no restrictions to study designs or healthcare setting. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with RT-PCR confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19, regardless of study setting. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Proportion (prevalence) data was pooled using random effects meta-analysis approach; and stratified based on region and study design. RESULTS: A total of 1058 studies were screened, of which 22, hospital-based studies were eligible, compromising 76,176 of COVID-19 patients. Pooled estimates for the prevalence of bacterial co-infection and antibiotic use were 5.62% (95% CI 2.26-10.31) and 61.77% (CI 50.95-70.90), respectively. Sub-group analysis by region demonstrated that bacterial co-infection was more prevalent in North American studies (7.89%, 95% CI 3.30-14.18). CONCLUSION: Prevalence of bacterial coinfection in COVID-19 is low, yet prevalence of antibiotic prescribing is high, indicating the need for targeted COVID-19 antimicrobial stewardship initiatives to reduce the global threat of AMR.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bacterial Infections / Coinfection / COVID-19 / COVID-19 Drug Treatment Type of study: Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bacterial Infections / Coinfection / COVID-19 / COVID-19 Drug Treatment Type of study: Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom Country of publication: United States