Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Medical Student-Run Telehealth Primary Care Clinic During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Maintaining Care for the Underserved.
Bliss, Joshua W; Yau, Annie; Beideck, Elena; Novak, Jesse S S; d'Andrea, Felipe B; Blobel, Nicolas J; Batavia, Ashita S; Charney, Pamela.
Affiliation
  • Bliss JW; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Yau A; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Beideck E; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Novak JSS; Weill Cornell Medicine/Sloan-Kettering/Rockefeller Tri-Institutional MD-PhD Program, New York, NY, USA.
  • d'Andrea FB; Weill Cornell Medicine/Sloan-Kettering/Rockefeller Tri-Institutional MD-PhD Program, New York, NY, USA.
  • Blobel NJ; Weill Cornell Medicine/Sloan-Kettering/Rockefeller Tri-Institutional MD-PhD Program, New York, NY, USA.
  • Batavia AS; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Charney P; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 13: 21501319221114831, 2022.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35920022
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In this report, we outline our approach to implementing a hybrid in-person and virtual clinic model at a student-run free clinic (SRFC) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Individuals of low socioeconomic status (SES) are at an increased risk for COVID-19 infection and severe clinical outcomes. It is unclear if telehealth is a viable continuity of care enabler for the underserved.

METHODS:

The Weill Cornell Community Clinic (WCCC) implemented a novel telehealth clinic model to serve uninsured patients in May 2020. A phone survey of was conducted to assess WCCC patients access to technology needed for telehealth visits (eg, personal computers, smartphones). Patient no-show rates were retrospectively assessed for both in-person (pre-pandemic) and hybrid continuity of care models.

RESULTS:

The phone survey found that 90% of WCCC patients had access to technology needed for telehealth visits. In the 8 months following implementation of the hybrid model, telehealth and in-person no-show rates were 11% (14/128) and 15% (10/67) respectively; the combined hybrid no-show rate was 12% (24/195). For comparison, the in-person 2019 no-show rate was 23% (84/367). This study aligns with previous reports that telehealth improves patient attendance.

CONCLUSION:

Literature on the transition of SRFCs from in-person to telehealth care delivery models is limited. At the WCCC, the reduction in no-show rates supports the feasibility and benefits of adopting telehealth for the delivery of care to underserved patient populations. We believe the hybrid telehealth model described here is a viable model for other student run free clinics to increase access to care in low SES communities.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Students, Medical / Telemedicine / Student Run Clinic / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Students, Medical / Telemedicine / Student Run Clinic / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States