Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Key questions in marine mammal bioenergetics.
McHuron, Elizabeth A; Adamczak, Stephanie; Arnould, John P Y; Ashe, Erin; Booth, Cormac; Bowen, W Don; Christiansen, Fredrik; Chudzinska, Magda; Costa, Daniel P; Fahlman, Andreas; Farmer, Nicholas A; Fortune, Sarah M E; Gallagher, Cara A; Keen, Kelly A; Madsen, Peter T; McMahon, Clive R; Nabe-Nielsen, Jacob; Noren, Dawn P; Noren, Shawn R; Pirotta, Enrico; Rosen, David A S; Speakman, Cassie N; Villegas-Amtmann, Stella; Williams, Rob.
Affiliation
  • McHuron EA; Cooperative Institute for Climate, Ocean, and Ecosystem Studies, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
  • Adamczak S; Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA.
  • Arnould JPY; School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia.
  • Ashe E; Oceans Initiative, Seattle, WA, 98102, USA.
  • Booth C; SMRU Consulting, Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews KY16 8LB, UK.
  • Bowen WD; Biology Department, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
  • Christiansen F; Aarhus Institute of Advanced Studies, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
  • Chudzinska M; SMRU Consulting, Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews KY16 8LB, UK.
  • Costa DP; Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA.
  • Fahlman A; Fundación Oceanogràfic de la Comunitat Valenciana, 46005 Valencia, Spain.
  • Farmer NA; NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Regional Office, St. Petersburg, FL, 33701, USA.
  • Fortune SME; Department of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
  • Gallagher CA; Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation, University of Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.
  • Keen KA; Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA.
  • Madsen PT; Zoophysiology, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
  • McMahon CR; IMOS Animal Tagging, Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, NSW 2088, Australia.
  • Nabe-Nielsen J; Department of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
  • Noren DP; Conservation Biology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, WA, 98112, USA.
  • Noren SR; Institute of Marine Science, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060, USA.
  • Pirotta E; Centre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews KY16 9LZ, UK.
  • Rosen DAS; Institute for Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1ZA, Canada.
  • Speakman CN; School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia.
  • Villegas-Amtmann S; Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA.
  • Williams R; Oceans Initiative, Seattle, WA, 98102, USA.
Conserv Physiol ; 10(1): coac055, 2022.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35949259
ABSTRACT
Bioenergetic approaches are increasingly used to understand how marine mammal populations could be affected by a changing and disturbed aquatic environment. There remain considerable gaps in our knowledge of marine mammal bioenergetics, which hinder the application of bioenergetic studies to inform policy decisions. We conducted a priority-setting exercise to identify high-priority unanswered questions in marine mammal bioenergetics, with an emphasis on questions relevant to conservation and management. Electronic communication and a virtual workshop were used to solicit and collate potential research questions from the marine mammal bioenergetic community. From a final list of 39 questions, 11 were identified as 'key' questions because they received votes from at least 50% of survey participants. Key questions included those related to energy intake (prey landscapes, exposure to human activities) and expenditure (field metabolic rate, exposure to human activities, lactation, time-activity budgets), energy allocation priorities, metrics of body condition and relationships with survival and reproductive success and extrapolation of data from one species to another. Existing tools to address key questions include labelled water, animal-borne sensors, mark-resight data from long-term research programs, environmental DNA and unmanned vehicles. Further validation of existing approaches and development of new methodologies are needed to comprehensively address some key questions, particularly for cetaceans. The identification of these key questions can provide a guiding framework to set research priorities, which ultimately may yield more accurate information to inform policies and better conserve marine mammal populations.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Conserv Physiol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Conserv Physiol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States