Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and Safety of JAK Inhibitors for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Meta-Analysis.
Wang, Faping; Tang, Xiaoju; Zhu, Min; Mao, Hui; Wan, Huajing; Luo, Fengming.
Affiliation
  • Wang F; Laboratory of Pulmonary Immunology and Inflammation, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
  • Tang X; Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
  • Zhu M; Laboratory of Pulmonary Immunology and Inflammation, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
  • Mao H; Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
  • Wan H; Laboratory of Pulmonary Immunology and Inflammation, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
  • Luo F; Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
J Clin Med ; 11(15)2022 Jul 30.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35956078
ABSTRACT

Background:

More and more trials have been conducted. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of different JAKinibs in RA.

Methods:

A systematic search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with JAKinib treatment in RA published in the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to May 2021 was performed.

Results:

37 trials involving 15,174 patients were identified. Pooled analysis revealed that JAKinibs were associated with significant therapeutic improvement in RA patients as determined by ACR20 (RR = 2.03, 95% CI 1.85 to 2.28) and HAQ-DI (MD = −0.31, 95% CI −0.33 to −0.28) over placebo. Compared to placebo, JAKinib treatment was also associated with more adverse events (RR = 1.10, p < 0.001; RR = 1.29, p < 0.001; RR = 1.59, p = 0.02). Baricitinib and upadacitinib were related to more frequent adverse events (RR = 1.10; 95% CI 1.01, 1.21; RR = 1.19; 95% CI 1.11, 1.28) and infection (RR = 1.22; 95% CI 1.09, 1.37; RR = 1.38; 95% CI 1.22, 1.56), whereas only baricitinib was associated with more herpes zoster (RR = 3.15; 95% CI 1.19, 8.33).

Conclusions:

JAKinibs were superior to placebo for improving signs, symptoms, and health-related quality of life in RA patients at short term, whereas the overall risk of adverse events and infections were greater with baricitinib and upadacitinib, and a higher risk of herpes zoster was only associated with baricitinib. More trials are needed to investigate the long-term safety.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Aspects: Patient_preference Language: En Journal: J Clin Med Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Aspects: Patient_preference Language: En Journal: J Clin Med Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China