Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Utilisation of complementary medicine in cancer patients and survivors: Expected benefits and its association to psychosocial factors.
Weis, Joachim; Gschwendtner, Kathrin; Güthlin, Corina; Holmberg, Christine; Horneber, Markus.
Affiliation
  • Weis J; Comprehensive Cancer Center University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Gschwendtner K; Clinic for General internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Güthlin C; Institute of General Practice, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Holmberg C; Research Methodology and Project Management in General Practice, Institute for General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University in Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Horneber M; Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main/Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 31(6): e13690, 2022 Nov.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35977747
INTRODUCTION: Previous research showed that various factors are associated with the use of complementary medicine (CM) in cancer patients. This study aimed to analyse the expected benefits of CM use in its association with medical, sociodemographic and psychosocial variables. METHODS: In a cross-sectional survey, we assessed the use of CM, expected benefits of CM, depression and quality of life. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed. Multiple regression analysis was carried out with the factors derived from the EFA as dependent variables. RESULTS: Based on 292 cancer CM user, EFA revealed two factors: a supportive effect (SPE) and an antitumoral effect (ATE). In the multiple regression analysis, reduced emotional functioning and the diagnosis of breast cancer are associated with the higher expectation of a supportive effect of CM (p < 0.001), explaining 7.1% of the variance. Emotional functioning, educational level and metastases are associated with higher expectation of an antitumoral effect of CM (p < 0.001) and explained 14.8% of the variance. DISCUSSION: This study provides evidence that two overall domains (supportive effect and anti-tumoural effect) characterise the benefits of CM expected by cancer patients. Psychosocial and medical variables are associated with both domains, but explain only small proportion of the variance.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Complementary Therapies / Breast Neoplasms Type of study: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Journal subject: ENFERMAGEM / NEOPLASIAS Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Complementary Therapies / Breast Neoplasms Type of study: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Journal subject: ENFERMAGEM / NEOPLASIAS Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany Country of publication: United kingdom