Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Environmental, energy, and economic impact assessment of sludge management alternatives based on incineration.
Xiao, Huaping; Li, Kai; Zhang, Dongqing; Tang, Zhihua; Niu, Xiaojun; Yi, Linzi; Lin, Zhang; Fu, Mingli.
Affiliation
  • Xiao H; School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, PR China.
  • Li K; School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, PR China.
  • Zhang D; School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology, Maoming, 525000, PR China. Electronic address: dqzhang3377@outlook.com.
  • Tang Z; Key Laboratory of Renewable Energy, Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, PR China. Electronic address: zhtang@ms.giec.ac.cn.
  • Niu X; School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, PR China; School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology, Maoming, 525000, PR China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment and Pollut
  • Yi L; Key Laboratory of Renewable Energy, Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, PR China.
  • Lin Z; School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, PR China.
  • Fu M; School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, PR China.
J Environ Manage ; 321: 115848, 2022 Nov 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35987051
ABSTRACT
In this study, different management strategies for sewage sludge disposal were evaluated associated with environmental, energy, and economic impact, using life cycle assessment (LCA), cumulative energy demand (CED) and life cycle costing (LCC) approaches. Four scenarios, including mono-incineration, co-incineration in municipal solid wastes (MSW) incineration plant, co-incineration in coal-fired power plant and co-incineration in cement kiln, were assessed. The environmental burdens generated from the sludge incineration contributed primarily to the global warming, followed by eutrophication, marine aquatic ecotoxicity, and human toxicity potential across the four scenarios. Furthermore, mono-incineration scenario appeared to be the most environmentally unfriendly, energy and economy intensive alternative, with the LCA, CED and LCC value of 5.41E-09, 1736 MJ and 1.84 million CNY, respectively. By contrast, co-incineration in cement kiln exhibited the lowest CED (368 MJ), LCC (0.59 million CNY), and environmental burdens (1.02E-09). In addition, the sensitivity analysis indicated that four scenarios were sensitive to the changes in the electricity efficiency and the moisture content contained in sewage sludge, suggesting that it was of great significance to enhance the efficiency of sludge dewatering and thermal drying The findings of this study can provide scientific reference for selecting the optimal strategies for the most environmentally and economically friendly sewage sludge management with optimum energy efficiency.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sewage / Refuse Disposal Type of study: Health_economic_evaluation Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Environ Manage Year: 2022 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sewage / Refuse Disposal Type of study: Health_economic_evaluation Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Environ Manage Year: 2022 Document type: Article