Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tubal ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study on clinical characteristics, treatment options and reproductive outcomes within 5 years.
Shen, Yu-Ting; Yang, Ying-Ying; Zhang, Ping-Gui; He, La-Man; Che, Rong-Hua; Li, Zhen; Lu, Wen.
Affiliation
  • Shen YT; Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, People's Republic of China.
  • Yang YY; Clinical Research Center, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, People's Republic of China.
  • Zhang PG; Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, People's Republic of China.
  • He LM; Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, People's Republic of China.
  • Che RH; Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, People's Republic of China.
  • Li Z; Clinical Research Center, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, People's Republic of China. zhen_li@tongji.edu.cn.
  • Lu W; Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, People's Republic of China. luwen@51mch.com.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 306(6): 2055-2062, 2022 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36036288
PURPOSE: To investigate the association between different treatments of tubal ectopic pregnancy (EP) -expectant management, methotrexate (MTX), selected or recommended laparoscopic surgery-and the subsequent reproductive outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including 228 EPs. The patients were divided into four treatment groups: 28 (12.3%) with expectant management successfully, 60 (26.3%) with MTX successfully, 140 patients with laparoscopic salpingectomy, of which 47 (20.6%) were assigned to selected surgery group because they opted for surgical treatment versus MTX, 93 (40.8%) were assigned to recommended surgery group as recommended by the attending physician. RESULTS: The recommended surgery group had the lowest rate of intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) (77.42%) and live birth (LB) (72.04%), while the incidence of recurrent EP (REP) (20.43%) was the highest, but the statistical differences were not significant. We did not observe significant differences of the EP-IUP time interval, rates of LB and miscarriage (MIS) between the four groups. Compared to the MTX group, recommended surgery was negatively associated with IUP (adjusted OR, 95%CI: 0.34, 0.11-1.03) and LB (0.35, 0.14-0.92), while it had higher risk for REP (3.48, 1.03-11.74) in the subsequent pregnancy. Further, compared to selective surgery group, recommended surgery was negatively associated with IUP (0.15, 0.03-0.68) and LB (0.23, 0.07-0.74), while it had higher risk for REP (6.83, 1.43-32.67) in the subsequent pregnancy. Expectant treatment was negatively associated with assisted reproductive technology (ART) (0.08, 0.02-0.40) compared with MTX. Of the185 patients who had LBs, all adverse outcomes were not statistically different between the four groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with recommended laparoscopic salpingectomy had worse reproductive outcomes than the other treatment groups. The disease status of EP may play an important role in the association rather than the surgery alone.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pregnancy, Tubal Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: Arch Gynecol Obstet Journal subject: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Country of publication: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pregnancy, Tubal Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: Arch Gynecol Obstet Journal subject: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Country of publication: Germany