Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
CT analysis of the posterior anatomical landmarks of the scoliotic spine.
Tromp, I N; Brink, R C; Homans, J F; Schlösser, T P C; van Stralen, M; Kruyt, M C; Chu, W C W; Cheng, J C Y; Castelein, R M.
Affiliation
  • Tromp IN; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Brink RC; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Homans JF; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Schlösser TPC; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • van Stralen M; Imaging Division, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Kruyt MC; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: M.C.Kruyt@umcutrecht.nl.
  • Chu WCW; Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
  • Cheng JCY; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
  • Castelein RM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Clin Radiol ; 77(11): 876-881, 2022 11.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36064659
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To use computed tomography (CT) to assess the validity and reliability of the posterior landmarks, spinous processes (SP), transverse processes (TP), and centre of lamina (COL), as compared to the Cobb angle to assess the curve severity and progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A consecutive series of CT examinations of severe AIS patients were included retrospectively. SP, TP, and COL angles were measured for all curves and compared to the Cobb angle.

RESULTS:

One hundred and five patients were included. The mean Cobb versus SP, TP, and COL angles were, 54° versus 37°, 49°, and 51° in the thoracic curves and 34° versus 26°, 31°, and 34° in the (thoraco)lumbar curves. Intraclass correlation coefficient values for intra-rater measurements of the SP, TP, and COL angles were 0.93, 0.97, and 0.95 and 0.70, 0.90, and 0.88 for inter-rater measurements. The correlations between the Cobb angle and SP, TP, and COL angles in thoracic and (thoraco)lumbar curves were 0.79 and 0.66, 0.87 and 0.84, and 0.80 and 0.70.

CONCLUSIONS:

The posterior spinal landmarks can be used for assessment of scoliosis severity in AIS; however, they show a systematic underestimation, but a strong correlation with the coronal Cobb angle. TP and COL angles had the highest validity.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Scoliosis Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Adolescent / Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Radiol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Scoliosis Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Adolescent / Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Radiol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands