Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A randomized, double-blind, parallel control study to evaluate the biosimilarity of QL1209 with Perjeta® in healthy male subjects.
Sun, Yuanyuan; Yang, Heng; Yang, Xiaoyan; Yang, Shuang; Guo, Can; Chen, Honghui; Cui, Chang; Xiang, Yuxia; Yang, Guoping; Huang, Jie.
Affiliation
  • Sun Y; Center of Clinical Pharmacology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Yang H; Department of Neurology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Yang X; Center of Clinical Pharmacology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Yang S; Center of Clinical Pharmacology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Guo C; Center of Clinical Pharmacology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Chen H; Center of Clinical Pharmacology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Cui C; Center of Clinical Pharmacology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Xiang Y; Center of Clinical Pharmacology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Yang G; Center of Clinical Pharmacology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Huang J; Research Center of Drug Clinical Evaluation of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Front Pharmacol ; 13: 953641, 2022.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36081953
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

This is the first study to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety and, immunogenicity of QL1209, a biosimilar of Perjeta®.

Methods:

This study was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled clinical trial evaluating the biosimilarity between QL1209 (specification 420 mg14 ml, single use via, manufacturer Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., batch number 201808001KJL) and Perjeta® (specification 420 mg 14 ml, single use via, manufacturer Roche Pharma AG, batch number H0309H02). The trial period was 99 days (blood samples for PK were collected 99 days after infusion). Serum concentrations were determined using a validated assay. PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental model and analyzed statistically. Anti-drug antibody (ADA)-positive samples were further tested for the presence of neutralization antibody detection (NAb).

Results:

A total of 137 healthy subjects were administrated. The subjects were randomized 11 to receive QL1209 or Perjeta® 420 mg intravenously. The geometric mean ratio (GMRs) for QL1209 versus Perjeta® are 104.14%, 104.09%, and 110.59% for Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞, respectively, and their 90% confidence interval (CIs) all fell within the predefined bioequivalence margin 80.00-125%. The incidence of drug-related adverse events was 95.6% and 95.5% in the QL1209 and Perjeta® groups, respectively, also comparable between the two groups.

Conclusion:

The results of this comparative clinical pharmacology study demonstrated the PK similarity of QL1209 (420 mg 14 ml) and Perjeta® (420 mg 14 ml) and there was no significant difference in safety and immunogenicity between QL1209 and Perjeta® manufactured by Roche Pharma AG.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials Language: En Journal: Front Pharmacol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials Language: En Journal: Front Pharmacol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China