Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Immunogenicity, Efficacy, and Safety of Biosimilar Insulin Aspart (MYL-1601D) Compared with Originator Insulin Aspart (Novolog®) in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes After 24 Weeks: A Randomized Open-Label Study.
Blevins, Thomas C; Raiter, Yaron; Sun, Bin; Donnelly, Charles; Shapiro, Roxann; Chullikana, Anoop; Rao, Anita; Vashishta, Laxmikant; Ranganna, Gopinath; Barve, Abhijit.
Affiliation
  • Blevins TC; Texas Diabetes and Endocrinology, Austin, Texas, USA.
  • Raiter Y; GE Healthcare, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  • Sun B; Viatris Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA.
  • Donnelly C; Viatris Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA.
  • Shapiro R; Viatris Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA.
  • Chullikana A; Biocon Research Limited, Bengaluru, India.
  • Rao A; Biocon Research Limited, Bengaluru, India.
  • Vashishta L; Alvogen Pharma India Pvt. Ltd, Bengaluru, India.
  • Ranganna G; Viatris, Bengaluru, India. gopi.ranganna@viatris.com.
  • Barve A; Viatris Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA.
BioDrugs ; 36(6): 761-772, 2022 Nov.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36114990
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

MYL-1601D is a proposed biosimilar of originator insulin aspart, Novolog®/NovoRapid® (Ref-InsAsp-US/Ref-InsAsp-EU).

OBJECTIVE:

This study assessed the immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety of MYL-1601D with Ref-InsAsp-US in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D).

METHODS:

This was a 24-week, open-label, randomized, phase III study. Patients were randomized 11 to mealtime MYL-1601D or Ref-InsAsp-US in combination with insulin glargine (Lantus SoloSTAR®) once daily. The treatment-emergent antibody response (TEAR) rate (defined as patients who were anti-insulin antibody [AIA] negative at baseline and became positive at any timepoint post-baseline or patients who were AIA positive at baseline and demonstrated a 4-fold increase in titer values at any timepoint post-baseline) was the primary endpoint. The study also compared the change from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), prandial, basal, and total daily insulin, 7-point self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) profiles, immunogenicity, and adverse events (AEs) including hypoglycemia.

RESULTS:

In total, 478 patients were included in the intent-to-treat analysis (MYL-1601D 238; Ref-InsAsp-US 240) set. The 90% confidence interval (CI) for the primary endpoint was within the pre-defined equivalence margin of ±11.7% and the treatment differences (SE) in TEAR responders between the treatment groups was - 2.86 (4.16) with 90% CI - 9.71 to 3.99. The mean (SD) changes from baseline for HbA1c, FPG, and insulin dosages were similar in both groups at week 24. The safety profiles including hypoglycemia, immune-related events, AEs, and other reported variables were similar between the treatment groups at week 24.

CONCLUSIONS:

MYL-1601D demonstrated similar immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety profiles to Ref-InsAsp-US in patients with T1D over 24 weeks. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION CLINICALTRIALS.GOV NCT03760068.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 / Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals / Hypoglycemia Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: BioDrugs Journal subject: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA / GENETICA MEDICA / TERAPEUTICA / TERAPIA POR MEDICAMENTOS Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 / Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals / Hypoglycemia Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: BioDrugs Journal subject: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA / GENETICA MEDICA / TERAPEUTICA / TERAPIA POR MEDICAMENTOS Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States
...