Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Variability in prey field structure drives inter-annual differences in prey encounter by a marine predator, the little penguin.
Phillips, Lachlan R; Carroll, Gemma; Jonsen, Ian; Harcourt, Robert; Brierley, Andrew S; Wilkins, Adam; Cox, Martin.
Affiliation
  • Phillips LR; Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Carroll G; School of Aquatic and Fisheries Sciences, University of Washington, WA, USA.
  • Jonsen I; Resource Ecology and Fisheries Management Division, NOAA Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, WA USA.
  • Harcourt R; Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Brierley AS; Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Wilkins A; Pelagic Ecology Research Group, Scottish Oceans Institute, Gatty Marine Laboratory, School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland KY16 8LB, UK.
  • Cox M; Field Friendly, 203 Channel Highway, Kingston, Tasmania 7050, Australia.
R Soc Open Sci ; 9(9): 220028, 2022 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36117863
ABSTRACT
Understanding how marine predators encounter prey across patchy landscapes remains challenging due to difficulties in measuring the three-dimensional structure of pelagic prey fields at scales relevant to animal movement. We measured at-sea behaviour of a central-place forager, the little penguin (Eudyptula minor), over 5 years (2015-2019) using GPS and dive loggers. We made contemporaneous measurements of the prey field within the penguins' foraging range via boat-based acoustic surveys. We developed a prey encounter index by comparing estimates of acoustic prey density encountered along actual penguin tracks to those encountered along simulated penguin tracks with the same characteristics as real tracks but that moved randomly through the prey field. In most years, penguin tracks encountered prey better than simulated random movements greater than 99% of the time, and penguin dive depths matched peaks in the vertical distribution of prey. However, when prey was unusually sparse and/or deep, penguins had worse than random prey encounter indices, exhibited dives that mismatched depth of maximum prey density, and females had abnormally low body mass (5.3% lower than average). Reductions in prey encounters owing to decreases in the density or accessibility of prey may ultimately lead to reduced fitness and population declines in central-place foraging marine predators.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: R Soc Open Sci Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: R Soc Open Sci Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia