Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reconciling Multiple Methane Detection and Quantification Systems at Oil and Gas Tank Battery Sites.
Stokes, Shannon; Tullos, Erin; Morris, Linley; Cardoso-Saldaña, Felipe J; Smith, Mackenzie; Conley, Stephen; Smith, Brendan; Allen, David T.
Affiliation
  • Stokes S; Center for Energy and Environmental Resources, University of Texas at Austin, 10100 Burnet Road, Austin, Texas 78758, United States.
  • Tullos E; Center for Energy and Environmental Resources, University of Texas at Austin, 10100 Burnet Road, Austin, Texas 78758, United States.
  • Morris L; ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company, Spring, Texas 77389, United States.
  • Cardoso-Saldaña FJ; Scientific Aviation, Boulder, Colorado 80301, United States.
  • Smith M; Center for Energy and Environmental Resources, University of Texas at Austin, 10100 Burnet Road, Austin, Texas 78758, United States.
  • Conley S; ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company, Spring, Texas 77389, United States.
  • Smith B; Scientific Aviation, Boulder, Colorado 80301, United States.
  • Allen DT; Scientific Aviation, Boulder, Colorado 80301, United States.
Environ Sci Technol ; 56(22): 16055-16061, 2022 11 15.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36315427
ABSTRACT
Emission rates were estimated for >100 oil and gas production sites with significant liquid-handling equipment (tank battery sites) in the Permian Basin of west Texas. Emission estimates based on equipment counts and emission factors, but not accounting for large uninventoried emission events, led to ensemble average emission rates of 1.8-3.6 kg/h per site. None of the site-specific emission estimates for individual sites, based on equipment counts, exceeded 10 kg/h. On-site drone-based emission measurements led to similar emission estimates for inventoried sources. Multiple aircraft measurement platforms were deployed and reported emissions exceeding 10 kg/h at 14-27% of the sites, and these high-emission rate sites accounted for 80-90% of total emissions for the ensemble of sites. The aircraft measurement systems were deployed asynchronously but within a 5 day period. At least half of the sites with emission rates above 10 kg/h detected by aircraft had emissions that did not persist at a level above 10 kg/h for repeat measurements, suggesting typical high-emission rate durations of a few days or less for many events. The two aircraft systems differed in their estimates of total emissions from the ensembles of sites sampled by more than a factor of 2; however, the normalized distributions of emissions for sites with emission rates of >10 kg/h were comparable for the two aircraft-based methods. The differences between the two aircraft-based platforms are attributed to a combination of factors; however, both aircraft-based emission measurement systems attribute a large fraction of emissions to sites with an emission rate of >10 kg/h.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Air Pollutants / Methane Type of study: Diagnostic_studies Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Environ Sci Technol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Air Pollutants / Methane Type of study: Diagnostic_studies Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Environ Sci Technol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States
...