Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Establishing open science research priorities in health psychology: a research prioritisation Delphi exercise.
Norris, Emma; Prescott, Amy; Noone, Chris; Green, James A; Reynolds, James; Grant, Sean Patrick; Toomey, Elaine.
Affiliation
  • Norris E; Health Behaviour Change Research Group; Department of Health Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.
  • Prescott A; Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.
  • Noone C; School of Psychology, NUI Galway, Galway, Ireland.
  • Green JA; Health Research Institute (HRI) and School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
  • Reynolds J; School of Psychology, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
  • Grant SP; School of Public Health, Indiana and Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Toomey E; Health Research Institute (HRI) and School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Psychol Health ; : 1-25, 2022 Oct 31.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36317294
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Research on Open Science practices in Health Psychology is lacking. This meta-research study aimed to identify research question priorities and obtain consensus on the Top 5 prioritised research questions for Open Science in Health Psychology. METHODS AND

MEASURES:

An international Delphi consensus study was conducted. Twenty-three experts in Open Science and Health Psychology within the European Health Psychology Society (EHPS) suggested research question priorities to create a 'long-list' of items (Phase 1). Forty-three EHPS members rated the importance of these items, ranked their top five and suggested their own additional items (Phase 2). Twenty-four EHPS members received feedback on Phase 2 responses and then re-rated and re-ranked their top five research questions (Phase 3).

RESULTS:

The top five ranked research question priorities were 1. 'To what extent are Open Science behaviours currently practised in Health Psychology?', 2. 'How can we maximise the usefulness of Open Data and Open Code resources?', 3. 'How can Open Data be increased within Health Psychology?', 4. 'What interventions are effective for increasing the adoption of Open Science in Health Psychology?' and 5. 'How can we increase free Open Access publishing in Health Psychology?'.

CONCLUSION:

Funding and resources should prioritise the research questions identified here.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Psychol Health Journal subject: PSICOLOGIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Psychol Health Journal subject: PSICOLOGIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom